Countering an Exile that exiles said Counterspell

Asked by ijustlikethepictures 3 years ago

My opponent cast Agonizing Remorse to exile my Spell Burst. May I use the targeted Spell Burst to counter Agonizing Remorse?

Kogarashi says... Accepted answer #1

Yes, this would work, if done correctly.

None of the rules text on Agonizing Remorse will take effect until the spell actually starts resolving. This means while your opponent would target one of their opponents (you, in this case), since targets are chosen at casting, you don't reveal your hand, and they don't choose a card from your hand or graveyard, until the spell actually resolves.

Meanwhile, knowing that your opponent is targeting you and will probably choose your Spell Burst (or something else you don't want to lose), you can respond to Agonizing Remorse on the stack by casting Spell Burst. This will counter Agonizing Remorse, and Remorse thus won't get to resolve.

This assumes, of course, that Spell Burst is in your hand and not your graveyard. If it's in your graveyard, you'll have to have something giving it flashback or similar in order to cast it.

And of course, if you've already let Agonizing Remorse start to resolve (reveal hand, opponent chooses a card), it's too late to respond.

May 19, 2020 8:33 p.m. Edited.

Thank you! This is crystal clear.

May 19, 2020 9:38 p.m.

420Broku69 says... #3

Kogarashi: its important to note that he said "targeted Spell Burst" meaning the spell is already resolving, thus technically not possible for the situation to work as he worded it.

May 22, 2020 1:35 a.m.

Kogarashi says... #4

420Broku69: it's equally important to note that Spell Burst is never actually targeted during the resolution of Agonizing Remorse. Agonizing Remorse targets an opponent, and when it resolves a spell is chosen from the revealed hand, not targeted.

Also, many new players (and even some experienced ones) misunderstand the order of how things work, and would think that as soon as Agonizing Remorse is paid for, that the targeted opponent has to reveal their hand so the caster can choose which card to exile, and then think that responses happen there. Hence the detailed explanation of how it actually works, just in case there was a misunderstanding in how the spell works, so that in the future they can make sure the steps are taken in the proper order. The wording of the question was ambiguous enough that we can't be sure (unless ijustlikethepictures lets us know) whether the spell was actually resolving, or they just thought that when it's cast, the caster immediately looks at the hand and picks a card before anything else happens.

You'll also note that my last line does say that if Agonizing Remorse had already started to resolve, with the hand revealed and the spell chosen, then it was too late to respond.

May 22, 2020 11:37 a.m.

Spell Burst has Buyback. I had used the card multiple times. My opponent knew it was in my hand without the need for me to reveal my hand.

May 22, 2020 11:49 a.m.

420Broku69 says... #6

Kogarashi: i realize the difference between "target" and "choose", but note that i was not the one who said it. i was simply repeating what OP said. i also noted your first sentence where you say it "does" work.

May 22, 2020 12:51 p.m.

Just clarifying the context of my predicament.

May 22, 2020 1:23 p.m.

Kogarashi says... #8

420Broku69: My first sentence says it works, if done correctly.

For instance, the opponent could have just as easily said, "I cast Agonizing Remorse, targeting your Spell Burst," which would have been incorrect phrasing but not on the part of the holder of Spell Burst. As pointed out, since Spell Burst has Buyback, if it's been used before and bought back to hand, then the opponent would know it's there without Agonizing Remorse needing to resolve.

My answer clarifies how the play should run, which would allow for countering Agonizing Remorse with Spell Burst. My intent was to explain how it would work, in addition to pointing out that if the Remorse is already resolving, it wouldn't work.

May 22, 2020 1:33 p.m.

420Broku69 says... #9

Kogarashi my point was you can't say "it works" when the "it" involves the remorse already resolving. that was the situation being described, and it does not work.

May 22, 2020 2:08 p.m.

Kogarashi says... #10

Again, we don't know for certain that the situation being described was Agonizing Remorse already resolving, versus an opponent who simply said they were going to use it on Spell Burst in the process of putting it on the stack (shortcutting to choosing a card they already knew was in the targeted player's hand).

My answer covered both scenarios.

May 22, 2020 3:02 p.m.

Please login to comment