H: Mox Opal MM2015 W: Eldrazi

The Trading Post forum

Posted on May 24, 2015, 10:11 a.m. by Grantley91

I'd love Emrakul or Ulamog but I would prefer some of the smaller guys (It That Betrays, Artisan, Pathrazer, etc).

I have a bunch of smaller ones from the box I just opened, what else are you looking for?

EDIT: Maybe just Artisans... So probably never mind, haha.

May 24, 2015 10:12 a.m. Edited.

maiden77 says... #3

hey mate, i have lots of artisans some path razers, an it that betrays spare too. Plus quite a large binder, fancy looking at my binder please? Very interested in that mox opal

May 24, 2015 10:18 a.m.

Grantley91 says... #4

So instead of trying to decide from the three of you who are interested in my Opal (ducttapedeckbox maiden77 and HalcyonMTG), I'm going to leave it up to you all. Which one of you is willing to give me the best deal? The Opal is worth $45. Let the bidding begin!

May 24, 2015 7:42 p.m.

I don't specifically want the Opal; was just looking for trades. I actually don't think I have enough I'm willing to trade for the Opal, so it's just between the other two.

May 24, 2015 7:44 p.m.

maiden77 says... #6

hey mate, so I have 2 offers I can put to the table. I like your opal, so using your $45. I can offer the following. Kozilek, Butcher of Truth (ROE) ($46) along with 2 Artisan of Kozileks (3) and an Ulamog's Crusher ($0.50) and Twincast ($2.50) and Pathrazer of Ulamog ($2.50) which totals $52.50.

Or, Foil Necropotence ($18), Angel of Jubilation ($2), Eye of Ugin ($9), Xenagos, God of Revels ($4.50), It That Betrays ($13), 2 Artisan of Kozileks ($3), 1 Ulamog's Crusher ($0.5), Twincast ($2.50), Pathrazer of Ulamog ($,2.39) which totals $55.

I might have more of the little guys though as per your wants so if you want more of those and less of the other stuff I can go an double check my collection. Or you can suggest a trade if you want, in whatever combination you feel like

May 25, 2015 3:54 a.m. Edited.

DAFFY-DOOM says... #7

My emrakul promo for your opal?

May 27, 2015 4:39 p.m.

This discussion has been closed