Specific Printing Question

TappedOut forum

Posted on Oct. 10, 2016, 9:52 a.m. by evileyeball

Hello tapped outI'm new On my PC I keep a spreadsheet with all my EDH decks in it. I wanted to upload some to tapped out for comment/criticism.

I managed to make a little output sheet in my sheet that can output the decklist in a format tapped out likes

CARDNAME (TLA) asteriskfasterisk for foil or nothing for non foil

What I Can't figure out is How do I tell tapped out that my deck has

Swamp Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 295/306

Swamp Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 295/306

Swamp Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 206/306

Swamp Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 206/306

Swamp Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 298/306

Swamp Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 298/306

Island Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 293/306

Island Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 293/306

Island Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 291/306

Island Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 291/306

Island Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 291/306

Island Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 292/306

Island Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 292/306

Island Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 292/306

Island Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 294/306

Island Basic Land 0 Ravnica: City of Guilds L 294/306

THOSE EXACT BASIC LANDS Not Just 10 Island but THOSE EXACT 10 Island

Also How do I tell Tapped out that I have Fallen Empires High Tide Version 2 in my deck NOT VERSION 1 NOT VERSION 3 NOT VERSION 4 but VERSION 2 with Art By Heather Hudson.

Are these something that is currently possible? or is this beyond what tapped out can do at the moment.I would like the online representations of my decks to be as accurate as possible. I chose specific specific Printings of specific cards for very specific reasons and I would like to be able to show this in my deck list.

Basic land printings are only available down to the set level. Choosing a specific land from a set it currently not a feature.

I am unsure regarding your other questions.

October 10, 2016 9:55 a.m.

evileyeball says... #3

Looks like the same is true for Non basic Lands and Multi printing Non lands such as Fallen Empires commons which all have 4 different printings.

How do I go about suggesting this as a feature? When I finally do built my Tron deck I want people to know that I'm using 1 of each Art from Antiquities. I wouldn't own 22 Black Bordered Tron Lands If I wasn't going to use one of each art.

October 10, 2016 10:03 a.m.

pskinn01 says... #4

The site does not allow you to differentiate different art from same set. Whether lands, or alt artwork in same set.

What you can do is make an alter for the card and upload a pic of the correct artwork as the alter. Or check to see if it is already on here. Then use the alter code to show the correct pic in the deck.

October 10, 2016 10:04 a.m.

Atony1400 says... #5

I was working on getting that feature implemented for KLD, but it doesn't seem to work properley yet, @yeaGO:

Plains

Plains

Plains

   Plains (KLD) V=1   Plains (KLD) V=2   Plains (KLD) V=3

(Just insert brackets)

October 10, 2016 10:28 a.m.

Epochalyptik says... #6

This is just my opinion, but I think it would be kind of annoying to have to visually and mentally parse
1x Swamp
1x Swamp
1x Swamp
1x Swamp
etc from every decklist instead of just seeing "oh, this person has four basic lands."

October 10, 2016 11:32 a.m.

yeaGO says... #7

this is theoretically available now. its just that i don't think all of the versions for all swamps have been added to the system.

October 10, 2016 12:13 p.m.

Atony1400 says... #8

I already added all the KLD ones, I'll get to BFZ and ZEN after.

October 10, 2016 1 p.m.

If this is implemented, would it be possible to have a user option to "condense" deck lists? I personally find it cluttered and hard to read when someone lists four different printings of the same card.

October 10, 2016 1:47 p.m.

yeaGO says... #10

doesn't sound like a bad thing to do by default anyway

October 10, 2016 1:58 p.m.

Atony1400 says... #11

Let's try again:

Plains

Plains

Plains

Nope,

October 10, 2016 3:32 p.m.

This discussion has been closed