A thing, a problem
Deck Help forum
Posted on Aug. 6, 2019, 2:17 a.m. by Nasser_inside1
http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/elemental-alzheimers/
My deck is pauper legal, only four uncommons, yet, somehow, the site says the deck isn’t pauper legal.
Nasser_inside1 says... #3
But they were in modern masters though.
I’m still confused, I meant I only have four uncommons not the maximum five,
August 6, 2019 2:25 a.m.
Nasser_inside1 says... #5
Is it legal to change the subject of this forum to how I can improve the deck Caerwyn?
August 6, 2019 2:30 a.m.
It is advisable to have someone like Caerwyn move the thread to a more appropriate forum.
Still, it will be best to give you some advise.
Elemental Alzheimer’s
Pauper
7 VIEWS | IN 1 FOLDER
Honestly, the deck is just a bunch of small dudes that are very close to being weak vanilla with no synergy. 2/2 for 3 mana that sacrifices itself to make 2 mana is not very impressive, especially when you have no expensive cards to spend that mana on. You get 0 utility out of Faithless Looting , as none of your cards want to be in the graveyard.
The crux is the 4 Sparkspitter , but that is not impressive. It takes a whole turn and 4 mana to turn a mountain into a Spark Elemental , which is not very powerful.
My advice - focus on Smokebraider . It is an incredibly powerful tool that can allow you to win the games. IT and Soulbright Flamekin combo very well to give you 8 mana for 6 mana invested and trample. Then you can take that mana and invest it in the Inner-Flame Igniter which for 9 gives you +3/+0 and first strike on all your dudes.
August 6, 2019 5:08 a.m.
This thread was moved to a more appropriate forum (auto-generated comment)
Caerwyn says... #2
100% of your cards must have been printed at common to be Pauper-legal - I do not know where you heard there was a four uncommon exception, but your source was incorrect.
If you click “highlight illegal cards” on the deck’s page, it will tell you which are not permitted in the format. In your case, Incandescent Soulstoke and Flamekin Harbinger have never been printed at common, and thus are not Pauper-legal.
August 6, 2019 2:24 a.m. Edited.