Cannot Create Decks

General forum

Posted on July 21, 2010, 10:46 p.m. by drizzy

How to add cards to your deck? I know most of them or already have a list I want to browse and search for cards to add

When I get to this point, if I pick either option and nothing happens, so I cannot enter any cards in.

I would love to know what I am doing wrong, if others are having this problem, and what we can do to get this fixed.

drizzy says... #2

How to add cards to your deck?

I know most of them or already have a list

I want to browse and search for cards to add


When I get to this point, if I pick either option, nothing happens. I cannot enter any cards in.

I would love to know what I am doing wrong, if others are having this problem, and what we can do to get this fixed.

July 21, 2010 10:47 p.m.

MDragoon423 says... #3

Yea, I've actually been having that problem too. What I do is just choose the first option, save the deck as a prototype and make it private. Then when it saves and you get to the blank deck page, you can click "Edit" on the left hand side and the box that allows you to enter cards is back.

I will probably e-mail yeaGO about this tomorrow. A real solution is probably a lot more efficient than my solution.

July 21, 2010 11:22 p.m.

drizzy says... #4

great idea sir!

July 21, 2010 11:28 p.m.

honeymomo says... #5

New deck builder is not pleasant. sad faces everywhere

July 22, 2010 1:07 a.m.

yeaGO says... #6

Clicking the second option and saving doesn't bring up the bulk-add below?

July 22, 2010 1:08 p.m.

MDragoon423 says... #7

Ah ha! Triumphant! Now when you click the first option and save, the site pretty much reloads itself, saves your deck and then the bulk add box is now visible again.

Just wondering, what prompted that change of having to have your deck saved first before entering cards?

July 22, 2010 1:16 p.m.

yeaGO says... #8

Yeah. It wasn't redirecting to the proper page. Kind of confusing.

The second option should bring you to the card section where you can browse around. You should see your deck at the top.

Basically, I wanted to allow users to browse around the site so I made the card adding option happen second. They can choose which they like in the first part.

July 22, 2010 1:17 p.m.

zandl says... #9

Ornithopter and Darksteel Citadel are in M15; is this Wizards simply reprinting some of the cheaper Modern staples or are they broadcasting something larger?

June 19, 2014 2:17 p.m.

The Doctor says... #10

Well this is fantastic.

I really hope it's a mixture. It's pretty well known that Modern is quickly approaching a Legacy level barrier of entry, so perhaps they are slowly going to leak in some of the staples.

June 19, 2014 2:41 p.m.

GoldGhost012 says... #11

Define something larger.

June 19, 2014 2:42 p.m.

zandl says... #12

I don't know; artifact land reprints? They'd really do nothing in Standard and they're already banned in Modern. It would make them all cheaper and be a very safe way to reprint them.

June 19, 2014 2:45 p.m.

zandl says... #13

I mean, not that $1.50 per land is expensive, but yeah.

June 19, 2014 2:45 p.m.

The Doctor says... #14

Perhaps not the colored artifact lands, but maybe stuff in the ways of the Nexus lands and Glimmervoid.

June 19, 2014 2:46 p.m.

GoldGhost012 says... #15

I would be on board with that.

June 19, 2014 2:49 p.m.

Slycne says... #16

I suspect artifacts and/or metalcraft may be the M15 sub-theme, like how it was slivers and exalted on previous two. We'll probably get a few of the Affinity staples as reprint. Probably not enough to have a good artifact deck in Standard, but enough to draft it as a shell and entice a few people to Modern.

June 19, 2014 3:15 p.m.

2austin5 says... #17

I think the sub theme is convoke

June 19, 2014 3:36 p.m.

inb4 Affinity redux.

June 19, 2014 4:09 p.m.

Schuesseled says... #19

Already planning a deck running both and Shrapnel Blast

Take a look if you want:

The future of Izzet

June 19, 2014 5:07 p.m.

gnarlicide says... #20

Fucking affinity. I cringe at that word.

June 19, 2014 5:27 p.m.

The Doctor says... #21

Affinity.

June 19, 2014 6:07 p.m.

zandl says... #22

June 19, 2014 6:35 p.m.

gnarlicide says... #23

Har har har, zandl.

June 19, 2014 6:42 p.m.

gnarlicide says... #24

It's not that I lose to affinity that often. I am just saying I would like to play against affinity about as much as I would like to dry-hump a light socket.

Trust me, it's not as sensual as it sounds.

June 19, 2014 6:45 p.m.

trentfaris242 says... #25

If they're going to be reprinting Modern staples, can they not reprint the ones more than $1?

June 19, 2014 6:52 p.m.

zandl says... #26

Uh. Isn't that the point of reprinting Modern staples? Because they cost too much already?

June 19, 2014 6:58 p.m.

GoldGhost012 says... #27

Wha...? How would... Why...? Nope, I'm done trying to imagine that.

June 19, 2014 7:04 p.m.

The Doctor says... #28

So you're saying that dry humping a light socket wouldn't be electrifying?

June 19, 2014 7:13 p.m.

gnarlicide says... #29

lol. I see what you did there...

June 19, 2014 7:17 p.m.

TheDoctor no more puns.

June 19, 2014 7:20 p.m.

swkelly89 says... #31

if you're looking at mythicspolier.com....idk, its seems fucky for M15

June 19, 2014 8:25 p.m.

spartan989 says... #32

Maybe something like Darksteel Colossus ;p

June 20, 2014 7:35 a.m.

TheGamer says... #33

I sure hope we can see somethings like Glimmervoid and other artifact lands. Maybe even Mox Opal ! Jk

June 20, 2014 9:38 a.m.

zandl says... #34

Darksteel Colossus would be neat. Blightsteel largely outclasses it, but I don't see Infect getting a reprint in anything but non-Standard collector's set (FtV) or a multiplayer set.

June 20, 2014 11:57 a.m.

megawurmple says... #35

If this is a signal of Wizards' intent to print Modern staples, they'd better stop messing around and actually reprint cards that people struggle to acquire.

June 23, 2014 5:50 a.m.

spartan989 says... #36

THE NEW SOUL ME WANT:some_text

June 23, 2014 5:59 a.m.

JWiley129 says... #37

Don't forget about the Red Soul, the Soul of Shandalar.

June 23, 2014 6:08 a.m.

ChiefBell says... #38

There are souls for all the colours. They're ok. Very disapponting mythics.

June 23, 2014 6:12 a.m.

JWiley129 says... #39

ChiefBell - just because they aren't Titans doesn't mean they aren't cool. Sure they might not see Constructed play, but since when did every card need to be Constructed playable?

June 23, 2014 6:15 a.m.

spartan989 says... #40

the only good mythic so far is the phyrexian soul, which is still somewaht average for a mythic.

June 23, 2014 6:29 a.m.

ChiefBell says... #41

For me personally, they're exceedingly disappointing.

They make no impact on the turn that they're played, unlike the titans - which makes them unplayable in constructed (which I care about most).

I don't think I'd even put these in a high powered cube.

My point about them being mythic is that they're pretty bad, and not even unbalanced in draft given that we have a healthy removal suite in M15, according to spoilers. Therefore, I would place these as rare instead.

June 23, 2014 6:29 a.m.

ChiefBell says... #42

To clarify - I like constructed. I think that mythics need to be at least fairly good in constructed. These aren't, and are therefore disappointing to me. The reason that mythics should be good in a constructed sense is that they're the least likely cards to show up in draft and they therefore have the lowest chance of unecessarily warping the game for everyone. Given that it's unlikely that they'll show up in large amounts - they can afford to be strong. This is especially true when the set has strong removal to deal with them anyway.

Hornet Queen is more playable than these.

June 23, 2014 6:31 a.m.

spartan989 says... #43

Malignus

we can hope for overpowered planeswalkers tho.

June 23, 2014 7:59 a.m.

trentfaris242 says... #44

Only good card I've seen so far is

June 23, 2014 8:07 a.m.

zandl says... #45

Aaaaand this thread becomes about all spoilers.

June 23, 2014 10:34 a.m.

TheGamer says... #46

Lol zandl... thats what I was thinking reading through the comments XD

June 23, 2014 10:39 a.m.

The Doctor says... #47

CanadianSamurai Forgot the space =P

June 23, 2014 3:10 p.m.

GoldGhost012 says... #48

Did anyone else notice that Soul of New Phyrexia looks a lot like Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite ?

June 23, 2014 3:27 p.m.

TheGamer says... #49

I did see that GoldGhost012. I also saw that he has the body of Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger

June 23, 2014 3:28 p.m.

GoldGhost012 says... #50

Oh god, the Praetors fused!

June 23, 2014 3:31 p.m.

This discussion has been closed