Where to buy poor condition cards?

Economics forum

Posted on Oct. 7, 2015, 8:54 p.m. by Sme4

I would like to know where I can buy poor condition cards such as Black Lotus or Time Walk for a lower price. also I am not certain if this is the right forum for this.

Please comment Thanks

where to*

October 7, 2015 8:55 p.m.

Sme4 says... #3

October 7, 2015 8:57 p.m.

Epochalyptik says... #4

This thread was moved to a more appropriate forum (auto-generated comment)

October 7, 2015 9:03 p.m.

CharlesMandore says... #5

Even in poor condition, you're still dropping quite a lot of money. These cards will never be "cheap", and most copies are held dearly by collectors. I'm not sure you can easily find a distributor for these kinds of cards.

October 7, 2015 9:14 p.m.

you can find them on TCG, but I'm sure you knew that. Due to the rarity of the cards regardless of their condition, you won't find any retailers who sell exclusively these cards, or even people who specialize in it.

October 7, 2015 9:39 p.m.

TehCoopeh says... #7

Here is a pretty good place.

Make a post, or browse, asking for the condition you want and the price range you're looking for, and then you can just ask for a review of the guy to make sure you're not dealing with anyone too shady.

I've done a few transactions there, and I've gotten good service from everyone I've worked with.

October 7, 2015 9:53 p.m.

torridus says... #8

TCGplayer has both.

Cheapest Black Lotus is from Unlimited and costs $3400. http://shop.tcgplayer.com/magic/unlimited-edition/black-lotus

Cheapest Time Walk is from Unlimited and costs $869.49. http://shop.tcgplayer.com/magic/unlimited-edition/time-walk

You can also check Facebook groups, StarCityGames, Ebay. and a lot of other sites.

October 7, 2015 10:30 p.m.

pryoplasm says... #9

for trying to acquire specific things, I sometimes like to use mtggoldfish.com to scope out various vendors and ebay. mtgprice.com is ok for some stuff, but the prices for certain vendors isn't always the most accurate.

October 8, 2015 8:05 a.m.

This discussion has been closed