Zur's Perfection

Commander / EDH outofnothing0

SCORE: 307 | 431 COMMENTS | 152060 VIEWS | IN 151 FOLDERS


More card draw! —Aug. 29, 2017

-1 Winds of Rath: I rarely if ever found I needed/used it.

+1 Ad Nauseam: To draw copious amounts of cards and hopefully one-shot someone with Empyrial Armor

-1 Isochron Scepter: kind of gimmicky and felt like a win-more card

+1 Dark Confidant: For some easy card draw with a creature body

outofnothing0 says... #1

The comments were getting out of hand so I've reset them; many were old and in regards to another version of the deck making them irrelevant. Here's to another few hundred, and always: Thanks for your continued support!

July 16, 2015 12:50 a.m.

enpc says... #2

I'd personally recommend against Forbid. When I tested it I found that I was barely ever actually buying it back, which at that point only made it Cancel. For 3CMC I would recommend Dissipate or Render Silent. There's also Mindbreak Trap which is amazing.

July 16, 2015 12:58 a.m.

outofnothing0 says... #3

While I realize I won't always be in a position to use the buyback on Forbid having the option to when I need it is really the reason it made the cut over the other spells you mentioned. I usually have boatloads of lands in my hand due to necropotence anyways and end up discarding them at end of turn so if i'm going to be discarding em anyways I might as well be chucking them to Forbid is what I'm thinking.

That being said Dissipate is very high on my list of potential additions for the future. Render Silent on the other hand was too color intensive to be consistently reliable during playtesting.

July 16, 2015 1:34 a.m.

enpc says... #4

That's fair.

Also, I would highly recommend taking a look into Mindbreak Trap. While it's one of the more costly counterspells, the exile is really worthwhile. Not to mention it shuts down storm and things like Boseiju, Who Shelters All so hard. And in a counter war, it can cost zero, which is also nice.

July 16, 2015 2:36 a.m.

sonalexander says... #5

Holy crap! You took almost all of my suggestions. Im honored. Truly. I do have one more for you.

Crucible of Worlds.

This card BELONGS here. I recently reconstructed the deck based off of your original design and only added Crucible to it. The play testing has been amazing.

On a perfect draw you have the ability to soft lock someone on turn 1 with it. Mana crypt, sol Ring, strip mine, Crucible of Worlds in opening hand. Then just wait till they miss a land drop.

Even without that. Dropping it after an Armageddon is clutch. With the amount of utility lands in this deck and land destruction in general. You need Crucible.

July 16, 2015 11:16 a.m.

NarejED says... #6

Still no Helm of Obedience in mainboard? I've been using it in my deck, and I end up winning with it a solid 25% of the time, either because Zur gets shot or because I happen to be a position to win with it a few turns faster.

July 16, 2015 12:02 p.m.

outofnothing0 says... #7

@ sonalexander: I appreciated you taking the time to add reasons for the suggested additions and even went so far as to make cut suggestions (which no one seems to do...). That being said a few of your suggested cuts don't work the way you thought they did. Steel of the Godhead does not do "essentially" the same thing as Daybreak Coronet, SOTG is for unblockable which I need to have at least 2 auras that do that in case I run into the problem of not being able to attack due to large flyers. Phyresis is in the deck as a one shot kill card, needing only 10 damage with it (not 15 which only applies to two-headed giant games). I've been meaning to update the deck to account for tuck rule changes and many of your suggestions pertained to that so I agreed with you for most of those. I've had my eye on snapcaster for awhile... Just haven't been able to playtest because I get glared at if its not a 5+ player game and I bring out Zur haha. I don't really feel like Crucible of Worlds is needed here as I usually have the game finished up before I'm worried about getting lands back, so aside from the cheesy Strip Mine combo I don't feel like it's worth a slot.

July 16, 2015 12:30 p.m.

sonalexander says... #8

Yeah you are right on the Godhead. My initial play testing saw it not really needed. But several games later i realized you need the double auras on the off chance you get them in your hand. My mistake. Just hadn't run into those situations yet. But i thought i compared SotGH to Unquestioned Authority as that card also makes Zur unblockable. As well as Daybreak.

Phyresis i realized later it was 10 poison. That was my bad. Everyone i play commander with insists it's 15. They didn't realize official rules were 10. I apologize for my misinformation. I still haven't run into a situation where its been needed though. As you say when you get the game locked i haven't found much of a difference in commander dmg vs poison. I know poison is 10 and commander is 21. But when you have both empyrial and ethereal armor in him with necro. He is a 1 hit kill anyways. I will play test it more and see how it turns out

And as for things like Snapcaster and the others in your maybe board. I was only trying to reaffirm your thoughts on those cards. They have been very helpful and felt perfect in the deck.

I understand the struggle trying to play test this deck. Most see Zur and just say "nope". I find myself asking to playtest it and letting people know is very competitive before hand to ease the situation.

As for Crucible. This might be a personal preference because I'm an old school U/W control player. I hate the idea of killing off my lands. Crucible removes that concern. Yes the soft lock is cheesy. But the card can serve more purpose too. Say you drop it on turn 2 or 3 with a fetch land. Now you don't get mana screwed. Same with mana vortex and statis. It helps keep those cards active.

Just some thoughts. Sounded like I offended you which i didn't mean too. Just trying to add insight to help with the perfection. I love to talk shop and theory craft.

July 16, 2015 5:55 p.m.

outofnothing0 says... #9

@NarejED: No i haven't put it in yet. I've been thinking about it though; It kinda feels like a mercy kill card, "here I'll end your suffering now"... haha. It'll probably end up replacing Mana Vortex (because it's slow) in the near future and function as a backup win-con.

@sonalexander: More often than not I tend to disagree with the suggestions people make so I like to tell them why I do or don't like the card in question; sometimes it may come across as hostile but it's never the intention, it's just my opinion on the matter.

July 16, 2015 8:48 p.m.

sonalexander says... #10

I agree with Vortex being a bit slow and Helm should totally be in here. This deck does lack an alternative win con.

July 17, 2015 11:11 a.m.

Wouldn't Diplomatic Immunity shroud Zur making it unable to be targeted?

July 22, 2015 6:46 p.m.

enpc says... #12

Zimmers_0: Zur's ability doesn't actually cast the enchantments/aura, just puts them into play. In the case of auras it just puts them into play attached to him, it doesn't ever target.

July 22, 2015 8:44 p.m.

Zimmers_0 What enpc said is correct, you will still be able to tutor with Zur's ability and attach Enchantments to him. However, if you have Immunity on him, you will not be able to cast one from your hand to enchant him. Which is exactly why I use See Beyond in my list, so I can toss back an Enchantment that I didn't want to draw.

July 23, 2015 11:13 a.m.

outofnothing0 says... #14

Thanks enpc & CrovaxTheCursed for answering on my behalf. I felt like an in depth (and irrefutable) answer might be more necessary as I get this question every time I wipe the comments.

@ Zimmers_0: From Zur's official rulings. I also grabbed the relevant rules clauses and broke them down.

7/15/2006 - If you use Zur the Enchanter's triggered ability to search for an Aura, it will be put onto the battlefield attached to an appropriate permanent. It doesn't target that permanent. If no appropriate permanent exists for it to be attached to, that Aura can't be put onto the battlefield and stays in your library.

303.4f If an Aura is entering the battlefield under a players control by any means other than by resolving as an Aura spell, and the effect putting it onto the battlefield doesnt specify the object or player the Aura will enchant, that player chooses what it will enchant as the Aura enters thebattlefield. The player must choose a legal object or player according to the Auras enchant ability and any other applicable effects.

303.4g If an Aura is entering the battlefield and there is no legal object or player for it to enchant, the Aura remains in its current zone, unless that zone is the stack. In that case, the Aura is put into its owners graveyard instead of entering the battlefield.

Because the object is "chosen" instead of targeted it bypasses shroud/hexproof (Just like clones do with copy effects).

When determining the "legality" of said object the player must ensure the aura is being attached to a card of the right permanent type (enchant creature vs enchant land, player, etc.), alternate conditions are met (ex/ Daybreak Coronet can only be attached if another aura is on the creature), the object is still in play (not in another zone like hand, graveyard, exile, etc.), and does not have protection from the color of the aura. If there are no legal targets the aura remains in the zone it came from (the library in this case) as per rule 303.4g.

Diplomatic Immunity does indeed prevent casting aura's from my hand (targeting Zur) which is why I run Scroll Rack and Jace, the Mind Sculptor to put auras from my hand back into the library.

July 24, 2015 2:34 p.m.

adatari says... #15

Can I ask why you Rest in Peace?

August 5, 2015 5:51 p.m.

enpc says... #16

It combos with Helm of Obedience to exile people's libraries. RIP provides a replacement effect meaning helm never puts a card into the graveyard and thus keeps trying to, exiling a players entire library in the process.

Not to mention its good as a toolbox card to deal with graveyard based decks.

August 5, 2015 5:56 p.m. Edited.

If you have the money, which I think you do, consider chains of mephistoles, the card is fucking ridiculous.

August 5, 2015 9:07 p.m.

Gyoko-hime says... #18

A thing of beauty. +1.

August 7, 2015 10:40 a.m.

IpCrash3r says... #19

I am proud to say that I have played against this disgusting beast, which led me to create a super control, Azami deck.

Even with 19 counterspells, Zur won most of the time :(

August 11, 2015 4:08 p.m.

NarejED says... #20

I see you put Spell Pierce in your sideboard. I would definitely recommend moving it to mainboard. Mid-late game it's not as amazing, but if you have it in your opening hand and you use it turn one on, say, a Sol Ring, it can completely wreck your opponent's setup. Huge early game disruption value, not to mention it hits Jace, Liliana, Oblivion Ring, and several other things that you don't want to see resolving that Flusterstorm can't. I'd cut either Foil, Forbid, or Misdirection for it.

August 16, 2015 3:25 p.m.

aranc23 says... #22

Besides substituting some targeted removal for more wipes, what changes would you make if you wanted to play this deck fundamentally but face 2-4 players?

August 21, 2015 10:25 a.m.

SomeDipshit says... #23

Hey outofnothing0, could you give your thoughts on Karmic Justice (as it relates to Zur)?

August 21, 2015 12:14 p.m.

Aztraeuz says... #24

I've got a Zur deck idea I want to build and I was wondering if you could help me. I was going to use obvious Zur goodies like Diplomatic Immunity and Steel of the Godhead but I want it to be Zur Constellation.

Lots of Enchantment Creatures, all Archtypes in his colors for example and all of the good Constellation cards for effects. Any way you could give me some pointers?

August 27, 2015 6:17 p.m.

I know I'm not outofnothing0 but to your question illumfolly I would say Karmic Justice is a good addition if:

You play in a multiplayer (3+) setting and have encountered a hostility that tends toward you. In my experience, my Zur deck was the only deck I had for about 5 or more months so it got to the point where I was public enemy number one at the table and when I added Karmic Justice I found it added a sense of safety as players had added mass enchantment destruction so when KJ was out it became a serious question of "Do I want to blow up all his enchantments and risk having all my stuff destroyed (including lands) or go after a weaker player and worry about Zur when I am stronger and better able to deal with him?"

If you're playing more one on one games is recommend either side boarding it and/or filling that card slot with something that is more pertinent that will allow me a quicker victory.

Sorry if I stole your thunder outofnothing0, just wanted to mention my personal experience with KJ.

September 3, 2015 1:35 a.m.