So your deck is labeled as Midrange, Aggro, and Control.
....Aaaaaand it kinda fails at all three.
December 4, 2012 3:49 p.m.
I plan to win between turns 8 and 12. so yeah, kinda midrange-pushing control, but it can aggro out if it needs to. and I don't like having 4-of shocks, just my personal preference. Have you actually tested the deck? because it seems to run very effectively to me.
December 4, 2012 5:12 p.m.
I agree with zandl. Pick a single strategy and adjust your deck accordingly.
December 5, 2012 12:41 p.m.
I would remove card:Avacyn's Pilgrim for 4x Farseek , then take out the Fiend Hunter s, Elvish Visionary , and Misthollow Griffin to add in more consistent, better forms of what they do. More Detention Sphere s/Oblivion Ring s could/should replace Fiend Hunter and Think Twice could/should replace Elvish Visionary . Misthollow Griffin could be replaced by something else, but you're already one card over. So just drop it altogether.
December 5, 2012 12:45 p.m.
Moorland Haunt creates an engine with Misthollow Griffin to create as many spirits as I need. Yes, it's alot of mana. but it works. I have also been running 61 card decks for months now, and the 61st is actually a land, not a castable card.
If I were to make the changes you suggest, I would just go back to big blue white, which I don't really feel like doing. The reason there are so many creatures is because this was aimed to be a creature-based control deck. The first thing to come out would probably be the card:Sphinx's Revelations.
December 5, 2012 4:24 p.m.
zandl, I would like you to take a look at this again. :P
December 8, 2012 2:17 a.m.
Having a land as your 61st card means nothing. I would argue that your 61st card is a spell.
Besides. You don't need 25 land in a deck that only goes up to 5 cmc.
Looks fairly inconsistent now. You have a ton of 2-ofs and 3-ofs, and your only playset is a ramp spell.
December 10, 2012 12:52 p.m.
I love the variety in this deck, you only have one 4x. However, I'm going to have to agree with zandl that if you want to be competitive with this you should make it a little more reliable and run 60 cards. Congrats on winning FNM with an unorthodox and original deck though!
December 10, 2012 11:38 p.m.
I should clarify what I was trying to say in my previous post.
Having a bunch of 2-ofs and 3-ofs doesn't mean the deck can't work. I just want your explanation on how consistent the deck is currently and what you intend to do if enough inconsistency should arise.
December 12, 2012 1:37 p.m.
I don't ever use the playtester on here, by the way. all of my clarifications will be from my actual paper deck of this, zandl.
Currently, the deck is working brilliantly. I make sure to pile shuffle between all my games, and I'm always making sure my land doesn't clump during sideboarding and such. The only time where the deck was inconsistent was in games 1 and 3 of round 4 of FNM, and then it clicked back into gear game 3, as I was able to swing the game all the way back around.
The only time I would define it as inconsistent is when I'm missing a utility land AND have no creatures to sacrifice to a Disciple of Bolas . Because, to be honest, I only need like 3 or 4 creatures for this deck to work miracles. Also, Garruk, Primal Hunter works as a second Disciple of Bolas for me, but he can keep providing value for me.
If the deck does go completley AWOL on me, I'm probably going to take out the Bloodgift Demon s for another Desecration Demon and probably another Disciple of Bolas .... that or another kill spell... but Bloodgift Demon has it's place as being a mean beater and getting me a secured victory by giving me additional cards.
December 12, 2012 10:56 p.m.
Why has nobody commented on the fact that this midrange deck only has two thragtusks? Could you please elaborate on this most disturbing fact.
ps: Why was mono black vampires in the 3-0 slot?
December 12, 2012 11:21 p.m.
Good job winning fnm and gotta love all these opinions 0_0 lol . I like the fact that you valued diff cards then just play sets . Actually shows you made a home brew then a "cookie cutter " deck which is what most people do. +1 from me
December 12, 2012 11:41 p.m.
Because It's not a core card. and I only own 2 and don't care to trade for more.
Vampires just got there, nobody was able to stop him but me :D
December 12, 2012 11:41 p.m.
Also, thank you knownasnieves! That's something I like to hear... I love brewing :D
December 12, 2012 11:42 p.m.
Yeah home brews actually show creativity which a huge portion of people lack lol. Every deck I've posted are home brews you should check some of them out they areant to bad .
December 12, 2012 11:55 p.m.
December 22, 2012 4:53 p.m.
Yeah, And I realize now that this deck is really weak to plansewalkers, so I kinda want to drop the white and go BUG...
December 22, 2012 8:16 p.m.
I would wait until we see more of what Gatecrash has in store for us before switching to BUG
December 22, 2012 9:51 p.m.
I was wandering through this site, looking at decks and I found this. This is the kind of home brew that I dream of but never make. Looks good and Its nice to see fresh decks. All Im going to sugest is better removal, modern is quick and your in white, so path to exile is a baller. +1 though boi. Keep Brewing.
January 2, 2016 9:55 p.m.
paper covers rock, rock smashes scissors, scissors cuts off my dick
subscribe to see me swallow a gallon of cum
May 31, 2017 10:41 a.m.
Please login to comment
|Date added||5 years|
|Last updated||4 years|
This deck is Modern legal.
|Tokens||5/5 Wurm, 3/3 Beast, 1/1 Spirit|
|Folders||Decks I Want to Try, Ideas, Other's Deck Ideas|
|Top rank||#89 on 2012-12-23|