- 4x Harnessed Lightning
- 4x Lambholt Pacifist
- 2x Lumbering Falls
- 3x Magma Spray
- 3x Nature's Way
- 3x Tireless Tracker
- 1x Wandering Fumarole
Fort Princess (4)
Girly Sparkles (4)
Fort - NO BOYS ALOWED (18)
Big Fatties (7)
But have you considered... Permeating Mass? See, this wonderful card combats some of Standard's most dangerous predators. Any of the Gideons? Let your opponent attack you with their indestructible 5/5 or 4/4's. They'll become 1/3 Permeating Masses. Against Aetherworks Marvel, wait for your opponent to attack with Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger and make it a 1/3. Never mind that pesky bit of text involving exiling cards. shhhhh. Or perhaps mono-black zombies! Just block their Lord of the Accursed or Metallic Mimic with a Permeating Mass. Your opponent will be sad, unless they have an Ormendahl, Profane Prince Flip. If so, simply eat a copy of Permeating Mass, and become one with the mass.
June 6, 2017 5:30 p.m.
Not ideal in a deck that aims to beat down with big hitters.
June 6, 2017 10:33 p.m.
Ya, I know, I just find the card very entertaining. Do you become a 1/3 Permeating Mass if you give yourself a cardboard cut (I don't know if that's a thing) with a copy, since it dealt combat damage to you?
June 7, 2017 8:08 a.m.
Paper cut. The worst kind of cut.
Worse than having your hand chopped off with a machete?
June 7, 2017 8:11 a.m.
I wonder how my opponent would feel if I attacked them (physically) with a copy of Permeating Mass. Probably like they were safe from the Eldrazi.
June 7, 2017 4:36 p.m.
They could just hold another Permeating Mass in front of their face to ward off the blow.
You would go for the face, right?
June 7, 2017 5:31 p.m.
Honestly I love finally seeing a temur deck that looks actually playable without Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger, but honestly I mean if your looking to cheat out some big boys, he is the biggest to cheat out right now.
June 13, 2017 1:57 p.m.
This deck sort of aims to have as many ways as possible for your fatties to hit the field.
June 13, 2017 2:12 p.m.
Ahh i see so instead of just one ultra fatty, you hit multiple medium fatties. that is actually pretty dope
June 13, 2017 2:20 p.m.
June 13, 2017 6:19 p.m.
dank_eater except he costs 7 to cast. I need to also have 6 drops.
June 14, 2017 2:39 a.m.
With Marvel out of the Format, I think you could go down on Dissenter's Deliverance. Still a good card against Vehicles, but I think a 4-off is too much.
June 14, 2017 4:23 a.m.
Could be right.
I'll leave it for the moment, as there are a lot of Vehicle decks in my local meta.
June 14, 2017 5:09 a.m.
June 14, 2017 5:54 a.m.
I'd say it's a good change. With Bounty you jump to 9 Mana anyway (given that you hit all your land drops), so a 6 drop doesnt matter as much.
Plus having an army of 7/6 with Trample ain't too bad.
June 14, 2017 6:01 a.m.
June 14, 2017 1:44 p.m.
June 14, 2017 11:07 p.m.
Zaueski I think you'll find that Champion of Rhonas is wearing a rather fetching necklace, and various pieces of arm and leg jewellery. He has therefore attired himself suitably to be declared an honourary girl.
As stipulated here.
If you are willing to adorn similar clobber you will be most welcome.
June 15, 2017 12:56 a.m.
Looks to me like its just armor and Cartouches which are more akin to medals of honor to them than it is jewelry. I'm still saying flavor fail but if you don't require assistance then I shall leave you be Princess
June 15, 2017 1:09 a.m.
Zaueski pffft you just can't recognise the latest fall fashions.
Also, flavour doesn't win you games.
June 15, 2017 6:43 a.m.
Do you like Sandwurm Convergence in this deck? It is a pretty bug pillow fort.
June 15, 2017 11:25 a.m.
June 15, 2017 12:07 p.m.
Sorry about that ACDAMAN.
I changed the name of this deck and forgot to update the button.
You're picking up all my button mishaps!
June 15, 2017 1:39 p.m.
Almost as fun as Custom Categories, which is where this deck got its name.
June 15, 2017 11:30 p.m.
hmmm, how can we make this deck more brocken ? WHY YES , Decimator of the Provinces . It is an insta win :)
June 16, 2017 2:22 p.m.
It's not a horrible idea but I aim to have any Creature able to be hard cast by turn 5, if I've got Bounty of the Luxa out.
I worry that this Creature might get stuck in my hand.
Or, that I won't actually cast it.
June 19, 2017 4:26 a.m.
well, i misread the card. All i wanted to tell, is that you should go for Deceiver of Form shenanigans. Such as Aetherwind Basker . Everything is a copy, so you get a LARGE ammount of energy, that can finish the opponent in a single attack . PLUS, you already use some energy counters xD or other creatures xD
P.S. i read your already considered cards. I just want to point out the ridiculousness of the deceiver xD
June 19, 2017 8:06 a.m.
Oh yeah, there are HEAPS of things that are crazy if paired with Deceiver of Form
Thing is, they also need pull their weight WITHOUT Deceiver of Form.
June 19, 2017 9:02 a.m.
Argy ALSO, apart from the cards, i have to really, REALLY focus on everything that is written . Just now, i read the title properly. i was reading " Nissa's Fart" and i thought that it was a cool name :S cause , you know, girls, are not supposed to fart and this is a deck, where nissa can fart etc etc . i feel terile :S
June 19, 2017 1:37 p.m.
ROUROU lol that is so FUNNY.
Of course my next deck title will now have to be someone farting.
June 19, 2017 8:09 p.m.
Thinks it's because he was in the 16 starter deck? Maybe? ccmaci
June 19, 2017 11:44 p.m.
June 20, 2017 2:04 a.m.
Sorry, most people don't know that the starter packs make it legal. I guess that's cool.
June 20, 2017 5:44 p.m.
SpookyToe yes it is.
Let me Google that for you.
ccmaci sorry, then they (and by that I mean YOU) should learn how to check the legality of cards before mouthing off about them.
Why wouldn't it be cool? That makes about as much sense as telling someone that you guess it's cool that they use Swamps in their deck.
I restrained myself from saying all that in my first response to you, but your continued rudeness has now brought this about.
Honestly people, before attempting to shame me for having a card in my deck that isn't Standard legal, how about checking it out first to see whether or not you are right.
Or do you think that you are so much more clever than every other person who has looked at this deck thus far?
June 20, 2017 6:37 p.m.
When I typed that message I didn't mean to sound rude, let me rephrase what I said:
"Sorry for not realizing the card was legal, most people (like myself) don't know that it is legal in standard and I think it is cool that this is playable in standard. I was confused when I looked up the legality of the card and found it said it was legal. My first comment was just curious why the card was legal."
I'm sorry for the miscommunication. If we were to talk in person, my voice wouldn't sound rude towards you.
I'm used to this happening sadly, with texts and stuff I'm not the greatest at thinking of how others will read my messages to themselves.
I would suggest saying the card's legality in the description of your decklist. Just so fewer people are confused on the matter.
Just some advice... if someone says something rude on this website, don't angrily comment back at that person. Just get an admin to mute/ban the ip of the person if becomes a problem like spam.
Sorry again for the miscommunication, I'm a fan of the decks you've been making and hope to see this one stay on the top of the topdeck list for a while :D
June 20, 2017 9:47 p.m.
There is no need for me to declare that cards in this deck are Standard legal.
The site has already done that. If there were cards that weren't, my deck would say "Standard*".
Just because two people thought they knew better, without checking, doesn't warrant me adding useless shit to my deck description.
I will respond to people how I see fit. I don't need pointers from you about how to conduct myself.
June 20, 2017 10:33 p.m.
ccmaci I didn't read the last post you wrote and I'm not interested in any more of your nonsense.
You made a mistake. Accept it, get over it, move on, and try not to be so fast in future to assume that you are right and someone else is wrong.
June 21, 2017 11:30 a.m.
a) Not a dude.
b) Should have apologised sooner. Then I would have read it.
June 21, 2017 4:14 p.m.
You read that as angry? You are projecting.
Just being straightforward.
Are you sitting there with your little fists screwed up, getting your knickers in a knot over something that doesn't even concern you?
Coz that's the mental image I have of you in my head.
Go ahead and post whatever you like. I'm just gonna delete it without reading it.
June 22, 2017 3:35 a.m.
Please login to comment
|Date added||3 weeks|
|Last updated||6 days|
This deck is Standard legal.
|Folders||2. Amonkhet, allies, Idea Farm, Standard, Standard, Interesting Decks, Cool, can appreciate, maybe, Archives: Standard, See all 12|
|Top rank||#1 on 2017-06-19|
Revision 7 (1 week ago)
|+4||Attune with Aether||main|
|-4||Nissa, Steward of Elements||main|
|-2||Soul of the Harvest||main|
|+4||Champion of Rhonas||main|
|-4||Attune with Aether||main|
|+2||Deceiver of Form||main|
|+3||Bounty of the Luxa||main|