Will you go hard in the formatting at some point in time? Or are you gonna keep it simple? Just wondering xP Good list so far though!

to link Putrefy

you have to type "user:putrefy" inside the brackets.

I was just about to type that Chief xD You beat me to it.

Nef I mean, unless it helps people understand and read it better, I don't really think that it's necessary. What do you have in mind?

ChiefBell Yep. Though it looks as if that was already fixed :)

Make it alphabetical when you have a chance.

I have no idea. You could also link primers to each of the deck types if they exist on the site.

ChiefBell I can spell!!

Nef I already link the main primer, which has everything.

True but perhaps someone is just looking for a specific primer? I dunno. Just an idea.

Tried multiple ways to make it copypastable, this is the best I could do. Sorry for no copypastability. pepperino

seriously though, the user: tag is really aggressive. I summon yeaGO in case he knows any way to actually display code in comment on T/O

Allies: Nef, JLenzen 
Amulet Bloom: nbarry223 
Blue Moon: ducttapedeckbox 
Control: JexInfinite, bijschjdbcd, CanadianShinobi, kyuuri117 
Delver: ChiefBell 
Gifts: slovakattack 
Grixis Twin: ThatJunkMage 
Infect: GlistenerAgent 
InfiniteTokens: xzzane 
Junk (Abzan): ChiefBell 
Jund: Scorprix, Putrefy 
Loam: ThatJunkMage, Jay 
Mardu: VampireArmy 
RDW/Burn: quesobueno123 
Restore Balance: Jay 
Rock (Golgari): APPLE01DOJ, ChiefBell 
Scapeshift: GlistenerAgent 
Soul Sisters: jex

I'm not an expert at anything :(

also before anyone suggests, PLAINTEXT tags make it look really ugly, because T/O does user: before PLAINTEXT, so it's like five pages long of html and it goes 20 pages to the side

MOTHER OF GOD YOU ALREADY ALPHABETIZED IT

my time is in vain

I know jund, and if you need help with merfolk, Mortem can tell you everything.

Scorprix Yep, you're already in there :) I'll add Mortem as well.

I suppose Twin is Control but should Twin require it's own section I play the deck a lot.

bijschjdbcd Well I put Grixis Twin as a different section, but I suppose that all Twins could go together.

This is... interesting? What brought this about?

I think its a good way of asking people questions.

You forgot Hatebears! Ryotenchi's good at that. And Zoo too, but I don't know an expert.

CanadianShinobi Ideas pop into my head randomly XD

6tennis I'm missing a lot of things... Fae, Ad Nauseam, Living End, GR Tron, Boggles, Zoo, Hatebears... It's not that I can't find them, I just don't know who to put for them. Though I'll add Ryo for the bears.

Make a forum post. "Looking for seasoned Ad Nauseam players" or whatever.

Well there's already one on the homepage for everything, so it probably wouldn't help... I'll probably start one if we don't have those archetypes done within 24 hours or so.

I'm actually more of a control player, just my amulet deck is one of my babies that I've worked on for a while.

A lot of the aggro decks are very straight forward to pilot, so just about any modern player on the list could help, since we should all be aware of the different archetypes and their respective "staples." Not that I'm trying to discount aggro decks, as knowing when to mulligan with them can be tricky sometimes.

nbarry223 Welp, my bad XD Do you want me to take you off Bloom Titan? I'll put you on the control list as well.

That's not true though. Affinity is hellishly difficult to pilot. Burn isn't easy. Delver and other tempo decks are really hard.

It's fine, I'm comfortable giving advise in just about any archetype. I've built and piloted my own versions of just about everything on that list.

I wouldn't call myself an "expert" in anything though, because I always feel there's room for improvement. I just feel there's always someone better out there, so I wouldn't label myself as that.

I understand what you mean by it though, so it's fine. I just think you're over-selling people's familiarity is all.

So should I take you off? It's your call.