When you say Tezzeret the Seeker , you mean Tezzeret, Agent of Bolas , right? The Seeker's ultimate wears off at end of your turn, so you wouldn't be able to Mirrorweave your fragile artifacts during your opponent's Mindslaver 'd turn, whereas the Agent's artifact animation is permanent.
Also: I. LOVE. THIS. DECK.
October 29, 2012 3:29 p.m.
Wouldn't Blacker Lotus (and any other 0 mana artifact) die before you could do this?
November 22, 2012 12:54 p.m.
oop, i realize now that's why you said you would have to use Tezzeret
November 22, 2012 12:55 p.m.
I fell out of my chair, that's hilarious! I love it!
November 22, 2012 1:32 p.m.
...I love you man... I really do. This is amazing.
November 23, 2012 12:26 a.m.
Can I just mention how appropriate it is for a player with the name upyourass to have a deck like this! Lol
November 23, 2012 11:07 p.m.
holy shit. you're a crazy fuck hahahahahahaha. love it +1
November 26, 2012 8:59 a.m.
oh my god. this is so genius and i love every bit of it. <3 +1 for shenanigans
November 26, 2012 10:23 a.m.
One of the best decks I ever seen in my life, I laugh really hard here!
November 27, 2012 9:01 p.m.
Er... this deck is amazing....except that March of the Machines would kill all of the lands...
November 27, 2012 9:51 p.m.
No!!! Why did you have to tear up all of my moxes and all of my dual lands!!! I now am going to have to use your head as a paperweight...
December 2, 2012 1:52 p.m.
I wonder how many fist fights you could start with this deck.
March 24, 2013 5:05 p.m.
March 26, 2013 9:39 a.m.
Wish I wouldn't have deleted my version of this deck. Deck poster pretty much copied my version card for card here.
March 27, 2013 9:01 a.m.
this is the only way to win a match by concedingyou rip there stuff up, concede, then you win because they no longer have a legal 60 card deck
April 6, 2013 6:36 a.m.
That doesn't make sense Evldmon. They have the choice to concede at ANY time in the match. Even before you get a chance to rip their cards up. Deck size has nothing to do with you winning.
April 6, 2013 8:21 a.m.
@moobu, ok but if you rip there field up and they don't concede, then you do, then at the start of the next game (in a 2 of 3 match) they can not play because they have an illegal deck, so you automatically win
April 6, 2013 7:20 p.m.
Problem is this is an Unformat deck. Which automatically means it doesn't qualify for any tournament play anywhere.
April 6, 2013 7:45 p.m.
Thank you for making a deck out of this great old combo. I have put a link to your deck on a best combo article on tappedout.
May 10, 2013 2:32 p.m.
is there a way to make the opponent float infinite mana on their turn so that the Chaos Confetti can be used to annhialate the entire field? without infinite mana, the most you can use chaos confetti during the opponent's turn is likely to be around 2-3. Chaos Orb would probably be more efficient (and without un-set cards), assuming they never actually added in a rule about ripping your cards up.
July 17, 2013 11:45 p.m.
Lol. I wouldn't play against this deck and I hope if you do you give your opponent enough time to concede before you start ripping cards..
Like it: +1
July 18, 2013 7:04 a.m.
If you wanted to be a little less of a dick, couldnt you use true name nemesis instead of chaos confetti or the lotus?
December 6, 2014 midnight
Would an act like this be against MTG rules, kind of like taking control of someone else's turn and then forcing them to concede?
March 19, 2015 4:43 p.m.
This is mind-blowing. I'd forfeit, I'd use it to make people forfeit, and I'm glad i read this so i know to forfeit..
September 18, 2015 10:14 a.m.
First off your comment about the particular 2 card combo is moot. I never claimed to invent the combo. I claimed that this particular 60 card arrangement was ripped directly from MY profile before I did some spring cleaning and deleted less serious decks that I was goofing off with. I stated in my original comment that I wish I hadn't deleted this deck from my profile because you plagiarized it CARD for CARD from me before hand. I just didn't notice in time before I deleted my original of it.
January 4, 2016 1:09 p.m.
Dude, its a pretty simple deck. It's a bunch of playsets with some land. Thats like saying someone copied your relentless rats deck card for card. It's not a complicated deck, and you are just making a fool of yourself. Just because someone had the same idea as you and it got them a lot of upvotes doesn't mean you have the right to whine in the comments of their deck. If you want to add constructive feedback, feel free. Just quit acting like a child.
January 4, 2016 2:34 p.m.
Relentless rats is a terrible example. This isn't like 30 of the cards are the same card in this deck. It would be different if this deck was the poster taking the idea and constructing his own variant of it. But it isn't, he literally copy pasted text from mine and posted it as his own.
January 4, 2016 8:53 p.m.
This deck actually doesn't allow you to rip up your opponents cards, but you force your opponent to rip up their own cards. Regardless, Win.
February 17, 2016 10:52 a.m.
Oh, wow, if this was in standard..................
Definitely +1-ing this.