Me gusta, el dures te da un primer turno muy bueno, lo veo muy solido.

esa fefitoo! esta pag no es gran cosa para mirar mazos pq hay muchos medio pelo, pero para armar y testear, va como moto.

Perhaps drop 1x Deathrite Shaman , you dont need more then 1 on the field at any point.

I have a very similar deck, have a look for some ideas deck:persistent-removal

One of the better Jund decks I've seen! My suggestion is drop 1x Abrupt Decay and 1x Dreadbore from the sideboard to add 2x Thragtusk . He's always good! Keeps you alive through aggro strategies. Also maybe drop a Deathrite Shaman for Thundermaw Hellkite ? +1

Btw check out my deck, deck:quirion-dryad-feedback-wanted

-1 Dreadbore , +1 Pillar of Flame .

Needs Kessig Wolf Run . You underestimate the power of Vampire Nighthawk with +2/+0 or +3/+0 and Trample.

@toxonic: I wanna keep the 4-of shamans, at least until I playtest the deck more and see how my local meta evolve.

@Maxread: Probably I cut 1 Dreadbore but I think that the Abrupt Decay will shine in this new standard filled with aggro decks that use a big amount of permanents that cost 3 or less. The Thragtusk depends on how the metagame evolves here in my city. If it becomes heavily aggro, I will replace Vraska the Unseen with him (I will put Thragtusk in the sideboard now ;) )

@zandl: I was thinking on that change too, I will test it. I will use 1 or 2 Kessig Wolf Run again, I moved it out looking for a better mana base, but it worth the risk.

Thanks for your comments people, I will return the feedback on your decks soon :D.

You have enough dual-lands to completely offset just one or two colorless-producing lands. I wouldn't go so far as to say it's a risk to use Kessig Wolf Run .

Hell, I ran Wolf Run RUG for the last 10 months at FNM with 9 or 10 colorless-producing lands, and rarely had issues.

Surely it isn't a risk, maybe I didn't use the correct word. I will test this new build, thanks for the recommendations.