pie chart

pie chart I N C E P T I O N



Sorcery (100)

Artifact (100)


Land (1)


We need to go deeper.


Comments View Archive

Exclaminator says... #1

the price is without the mox pearl wich is 600 dollar each. this is just 100 time sharazard at 45 dollar.

so that would count up to 64,500 dollar.

and this deck isn't legal in anny format.(except roflcopter leage)

but yeah good fun.

February 26, 2011 5:41 p.m.

doinitwrong says... #2


February 26, 2011 9:39 p.m.

kyshr7 says... #3

you sir are my hero.

February 27, 2011 12:23 a.m.

kyshr7 says... #4

you sir, are my hero.

February 27, 2011 12:23 a.m.

Slavemachines says... #5

i see what you did there. cool story bro...YOUR Friggin WINNING!!! oh man, this made me laugh tits out of my mouth

February 27, 2011 2:09 a.m.

Slavemachines says... #6

i tried playtesting this deck against my ramping death...its been..so long..cant...win..

February 27, 2011 2:10 a.m.

drizzy says... #7

I think you might want to consider making this deck 60 cards as you will have a better chance of pulling your combo.


February 27, 2011 9:01 a.m.

Exclaminator says... #8

nah stay this size otherwise you would lose because your own tactique

February 27, 2011 9:20 a.m.

doinitwrong says... #9

Check out my Shahrazad deck, deck:because-i-can-there-is-no-other-reason

February 27, 2011 11:57 a.m.

Crono954 says... #10

Why did you have to divide by zero?!?

February 27, 2011 10:52 p.m.

GarudaOmega says... #11


February 28, 2011 4:08 a.m.

zoo417 says... #12

This is my favourite deck on TO.

February 28, 2011 10:09 a.m.

TikiShades says... #13

See above.

February 28, 2011 10:52 a.m.

u'd lose, but yeah lolz

February 28, 2011 5:54 p.m.

u'd lose, but yeah lolz

February 28, 2011 5:54 p.m.

The only flaw with this brilliance would be the "halving his/her life points, rounded down" because you would never be able to drop opponent's life below 1...no matter how many subgames they should lose. Half of 1 rounded down will always be zero.

February 28, 2011 10:13 p.m.

Shade5159 says... #17

@Geniusholmes13: Hur... dur.... derp.

February 28, 2011 11:30 p.m.

DrSteveBrule says... #18


If I had the money for 100 Mox Pearls and 100 Shahrazads, I would build this deck.




March 1, 2011 2:06 a.m.

adinsx says... #19

@Geniusholmes13: ?

From the Oracle text: "Players play a MAGIC subgame, using their libraries as their decks. Each player who doesn't win the subgame loses half his or her life, rounded up"

The original wording of the card set your life to "half of 1, rounded down", which is 0. They changed it to read "Loses half rounded up" in Oracle because the original wording was somewhat confusing.

The deck works fine. Or am I misreading what you said?

March 1, 2011 4:26 a.m.

weterr123 says... #20

THIS IS EPIC!!! love the idea of inception as well, hilarious!!

March 1, 2011 7:18 p.m.

FatFailKid says... #21

Wheres the Kick? XD jk

March 1, 2011 7:40 p.m.

doinitwrong says... #22

There can't be a kick. EVERYONE'S dreaming, so there's no one op a level to do a kick.

March 1, 2011 8:11 p.m.

doinitwrong says... #23

There can't be a kick. EVERYONE'S dreaming, so there's no one op a level to do a kick.

March 1, 2011 8:11 p.m.

SwiftDeath says... #24

the kick is a Sunlance

March 1, 2011 11:57 p.m.

SwiftDeath says... #25

omit last comment i failed i thought it could be done to player too.

March 1, 2011 11:58 p.m.

SwiftDeath says... #26

the kick should be card:Harm's Way

March 2, 2011 12:07 a.m.

wildstallion says... #27

it needs more relentless rats!

March 2, 2011 3:28 p.m.

BrownDog5117 says... #28

oh no!!!! Am I in a dream or not??

I need to use my totem card:Sensei's Divining Top

March 3, 2011 12:04 p.m.

theburchman says... #29

why not 50 Shahrazad

March 3, 2011 4:39 p.m.

theburchman says... #30

why not 50 Shahrazad

March 3, 2011 4:40 p.m.

theburchman says... #31

why not 50 Shahrazad

March 3, 2011 4:40 p.m.

theburchman says... #32

why not 50 Shahrazad

March 3, 2011 4:43 p.m.

BrownDog5117 says... #33

oh jeeze... theburchman is definitely dreaming.. he's leaving a comment for every layer

March 3, 2011 6:36 p.m.

The card must have errata text, that was fixed in oracle. The card I have says "loser of subgame halving his or her remaining life points, rounding down."

So if they fixed the text on that, I withdraw my previous comment.

March 3, 2011 6:59 p.m.

PoxMaster says... #35

Awesome. +1.


March 4, 2011 2:42 a.m.

alexd777 says... #36

This wouldn't work... What if someone had training, from the military to counter your Shahrazad and spawn imaginary armies-orsomething.

AND even without doing that! You still couldn't control Leo's mind. His mental creations of his dead wife would manifest themselves in the layers and bone you over at every turn-forsomereason.

March 4, 2011 7:45 a.m.

AetherHeaven says... #37

a game, within a game, within a game, within a game...

March 4, 2011 9:15 p.m.

LoveLessNHK says... #38

I am become INCEPTION

March 4, 2011 11:28 p.m.

brunolira says... #39

This is a masterpiece. kudos+

March 6, 2011 4:07 a.m.

I have the weirdest boner...

March 6, 2011 7:05 a.m.

Thefinnguy says... #41

March 6, 2011 6:26 p.m.

Thefinnguy says... #42

March 6, 2011 6:26 p.m.

Thefinnguy says... #43

March 6, 2011 6:26 p.m.

Thefinnguy says... #44

March 6, 2011 6:26 p.m.

Thefinnguy says... #45

March 6, 2011 6:27 p.m.

LeXaN says... #46

Epic Win!

March 7, 2011 12:18 p.m.

Lilwolf says... #47

you made me lol. A lot.

March 7, 2011 3:21 p.m.

No_Scoops says... #48

The reason this won't work is because Hulk Flash is only restricted, but can still beat this impossible deck

March 8, 2011 4:56 p.m.

jgiff says... #49

ok now thats a piss of deck.lol

March 9, 2011 10:57 p.m.

jgiff says... #50

ok now thats a piss of deck.lol

March 9, 2011 10:57 p.m.

Naxius says... #51

i think my brain just imploded...

March 10, 2011 12:03 a.m.

Crono954 says... #52

Hey yo dawg! I heard you like playing Magic The Gathering, so we got you this deck! Now you can play Magic The Gathering while you play Magic The Gathering!

Sorry, I just had to say it.

March 10, 2011 11:07 p.m.

weterr123 says... #53

I'm definitely dreaming.... I just rolled a D20 to decide who goes first, and it's not stopping on a number...

March 27, 2011 7:06 p.m.

Kaento says... #54

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha I love itMfw you draw only opals or shahrazad :D

May 18, 2011 7:46 p.m.

weterr123 says... #55

still can't get over this deck

May 19, 2011 9:25 a.m.

Nighthawk86 says... #56

Only one word can describe this deck... Booya!

Well, if you were the opponent, there might be some other choice words, but I'm not going to bother saying them as they are not appropriate :P. +1!

August 21, 2011 10:17 a.m.

doinitwrong says... #57

I can think of some words an opponent could say: Force of Will , Surgical Extraction .

August 21, 2011 11:07 a.m.

theburchman says... #58

so you would lose just that subgame doinitwrong.

September 22, 2011 8:41 p.m.

Oh, and for those concerned with drawing only Shahrazad s or Mox Opal s (just that one guy), you can still mulligan. Hell, you can mulligan all the way down to 3 cards and still draw the combo. The odds of needing to do that are ridiculously slim, though. And yes, it is true, even if somebody pulled off a hulk-flash and owned your face, it would only matter if you were in the first layer. Otherwise you would just lose that subgame, start a new one, and continue on your way. Also, having a spell countered wouldn't really hurt so much if you had 99 more copies of it to cast.

This is all hypothetical, of course...

September 23, 2011 2:18 a.m.

weterr123 says... #60

Hypothetical or not, that is correct.

September 23, 2011 6:34 p.m.

skyb0rg says... #61

Technically, you could play a 65 card deck, ensuring you will still win. It's only $32919.37 from starcity!

January 21, 2012 6:52 p.m.

skyb0rg says... #62

But what if your opponent mulls down to 0?

February 29, 2012 12:25 p.m.

Loses every single time to Banned in Freeform.

August 18, 2012 9:24 p.m.

Wretched says... #64

lol @ you sir.

August 22, 2012 4:41 a.m.

MTNman says... #65

lol. glad i looked at this

August 31, 2012 10:58 p.m.

farmerreuben says... #66

so funny, I really needed that

November 10, 2012 9:15 p.m.

xzzane says... #67

Would you care for a duel within a duel within a duel within a duel? And more duels?

December 9, 2012 12:30 a.m.

mgolden356 says... #68

oh, it's only 60,000 dollars

November 25, 2013 6:31 a.m.

sonnet666 says... #69

this can be done without being worth a small house by using 50 Gemstone Caverns and 50 plains.

It gives your opponent chances to beat you in the minigames, but you'd probably still win.

Also I'm not sure if this deck works the way it was originally described, nothing says your life totals carry between games. That means when you put them to 0 in level 8 you bump back up to level 7 where their life has once again been set to 10. You then have to create a new level 8 where their life is at 20 and set them back to 0 to put level 7 to 5, and repeat, and repeat, and repeat... It works, but it takes eternity.

It's kind of like doing a tower of Hanoi where you have to shuffle cards every time you move a piece.

December 15, 2013 3:42 a.m.

sonnet666 says... #70

Oh... Is it bad i didn't realize this was a freeform deck until after I typed all that?

December 15, 2013 3:52 a.m.

You should add some Rootwalla because they are super overpowered.

September 15, 2014 8:39 a.m.

KingDevyn says... #72

This still looses to 60x Chancellor of the Dross

March 5, 2015 6:19 p.m.

What's with the Gemstone Caverns?

March 26, 2015 10:55 a.m.

magicspacecow says... #74

LOL, this is beautiful!!!

June 2, 2016 12:18 a.m.

IQuarent says... #75

A fun casual deck to play with family members you don't like for the low, low price of $124951!

September 5, 2016 6:38 a.m.

Please login to comment

Compare to inventory
Date added 6 years
Last updated 11 months

This deck is Vintage legal.

Cards 200
Avg. CMC 1.00
Folders Other People's Cool Decks, New, m[, pro ideas, Funny Favorites, Interesting Decks, Favorites, Wicked-Powerful Decks, Other People's Decks, other peoples decks, See all 19
Top rank #1 on 2012-08-18
Views 29206

Similar Decks