Drop the two Thunderbolt s and the two Thatcher Revolt s for amount of possibilities for good options, such as Stonewright , Annihilating Fire , or Rakdos Shred-Freak

I like how cheap and quick all your creatures are however because the only creatures you have that don't have haste are your one drops the two Lightning Mauler s might not be needed. I find Stonewright or Pyreheart Wolf might be more beneficial.

Drop Thunderous Wrath and 1 Vexing Devil for 3 Pyreheart Wolf ...very fun if you bond haste onto it and gives you two swings in which you usually win

I would definitly add some Pyreheart Wolf ... it's a very useful card and it has undying to so it's a must have in each mono-red deck!

maybe you should take a look at the deck I'm currently running: I'm Batman! Shhhh!!!But nice deck... +1

You don't have a large enough creature density for Hellrider , Vexing Devil doesn't count, and it's not that great either... Play more 2 drops and all the Pyreheart Wolf (ve)s

You aren't optimizing Bonfire of the Damned with 21 land. In a 21 land build you aim to win the turn you play Hellrider. Mizzium Mortars similarly inefficient, but fine. Thunderous Wrath is questionable, chance shouldn't be your game plan. Pillar of Flame and Searing Spear are where you want to be here.

I recommend a core of Rakdos Cackler , Stromkirk Noble , Ash Zealot , Gore-House Chainwalker , Pyreheart Wolf , and Hellrider , with at least 21 lands. It's a good place to start, and you can fit whatever you want around it.

What Toddington said.Also consider Stonewright and Lightning Mauler

Not making a deck like all the other RDW. Gore-House Chainwalker blows in my opinion. Much better things to put in his spot. Vexing Devil is underrated here since he's a low CMC creature (or burn spell). Lightning Mauler has seen his time and removed for Pyreheart Wolf . THIS WON'T BE A META DECK SO NO META DECK SUGGESTIONS PLEASE. I homebrew and will only do so to prove that creativity is better than copy-paste decks

Ha fair enough, but there's a reason why meta decks emerge, they are the optimized, tested build. You want people to suggest the bad cards that don't see any play?

You say there's better things to put in the 2CMC slot, so do it! My point about Hellrider creature density stands, it has nothing to do with meta.

I understand the point about Hellrider and i do believe i have filled the spot that Gore-House Chainwalker would have sucked up. I also understand the whole thing about pro decks tested, this and that, but whats the point of playing if the only thing played is what someone other than yourself made? If it was the same, there would be no point in posting since there would be hundreds (or thousands) just like it on the net. I've done fairly well with most decks I've made and they have stood with many of the meta decks. Even if i don't always win, I would rather lose with my own idea than a win with someone esle's