Fight Deck

Lmao, I thought about it but never really saw how to put it together. This's just mean, and I like mean. The suggestions I would make is to replace the shaman with the standard version which is Viridian Corrupter. To make this standard that is.

May 11, 2012 11:12 a.m.

thank you for bringing that to my attention.

Viridian Shaman was an accident. I fully intended for that to be Viridian Emissary. I fixed that now.

May 11, 2012 11:22 a.m.

Somberwald Sage is awesome, keep it in mind.

May 14, 2012 6:05 p.m.

no Revenge of the Hunted ? your ooze can get muuuch bigger much faster.

May 17, 2012 4:22 p.m.

Mono green you should run Dungrove Elder

May 17, 2012 4:23 p.m.

I've cut 2 Wolfir Avenger and 1 Vorapede to include 3 Dungrove Elder

as for Revenge of the Hunted I've decided to put that in my side board. Most match-ups aren't going to have a large number of creatures sitting around waiting to block my guys, but against Lingering Souls/Intangible Virtue decks, Revenge of the Hunted on a Predator Ooze sounds like strong play, even when you hard cast it, so It fits well in the sideboard.

May 17, 2012 5:48 p.m.

FIGHT BEAR!

May 26, 2012 2:36 p.m.

Maybe remove 1-2 of something for card:Green Sun's Zenith ? But really, I shouldn't be commenting because "The first rule of the Fight Deck: You do not comment on the Fight Deck"

May 26, 2012 2:41 p.m.

June 4, 2012 10:57 a.m.

I really like this deck! love the idea of swinging with the ooze to add a counter to him then before the declare blockers step activating the tracker to have your ooze kill a potential blocker and add another counter to the ooze.

your sideboard should be able to tweak your deck into a more beat-down aggro deck for control match-ups.

+1 from me

June 4, 2012 11:02 a.m.

The first rule about Fight Deck is: You don't talk about Fight Deck.

+1

July 17, 2012 7:24 p.m.

Has anyone noticed how some people say "+1" in the comment, yet the score remains the same as it was before?

July 17, 2012 7:27 p.m.

Heh, thanks Sam_I_am I actually forgot to. Fixed now.

In all seriousness I really like this deck. I had written off Ulvenwald Tracker as inefficient, but you really make it shine.

July 17, 2012 7:47 p.m.

This looks like a great deck. The only thing I would suggest would be maybe removing a couple things (maybe a couple Llanowar Elves ) for 2 Rampant Growth s or card:Ranger's Paths. This would boost up the Dungrove Elder s and you don't have a ton of high drops for the elves to be super useful anyway.

I have noticed the +1 thing on many of my own decks, I find it funny.

July 17, 2012 7:49 p.m.

Llanowar Elves powers out my 3 drops on turn 2, and 2 of them power out 5 drops on turn 3

July 17, 2012 8:23 p.m.

Have you ever run this at fnm or battle tested it? Also where are your nightshade peddlers?

July 22, 2012 6:09 p.m.

I started cutting Nightshade Peddler because they normally didn't seem to do too much for me.

I came in first place last FNM, and the FNM before that, I came in second

July 22, 2012 6:34 p.m.

I like this deck! Way to go putting them all together. I might be stupid to suggest a Lumberknot for a late game monster and a Ring of Kalonia . +1 on this one!

July 24, 2012 11:13 a.m.

Why not 4 dungrove elder?

July 24, 2012 11:43 a.m.

i may of just miss understood your description, but deathtouch, first strike, lifelink, etc. does not work with fighting, because it does not count as combat damage.

August 5, 2012 9:48 p.m.

@chowline lifelink and deathtouch do work for non-combat damage, so does infect

first strike, however, is different because it defines at what point the creature assigns damage during the combat step.

August 6, 2012 7:57 p.m.

i am very confused, everyone online says the deathtouch + fight works, but according to the rules

702.2b Any nonzero amount of combat damage assigned to a creature by a source with deathtouch is considered to be lethal damage, up to that creature's toughness. See rules 510.1c-d.

thus since they are not dealing combat damage the combo doesn't work, correct? If i am wrong i do apologize.

August 7, 2012 10:34 p.m.

702.2c A creature with toughness greater than 0 thats been dealt damage by a source withdeathtouch since the last time state-based actions were checked is destroyed as a state-basedaction. See rule 704.

August 7, 2012 10:50 p.m.