Just my two cents on your Sign in Blood vs Read the Bones dilemma: I love both of these cards, but the subtler differences between them are what's going to make your mind up on it. Obviously RtB is a better option for card draw. It's easier on multicolor decks, and digs twice as deep as Sign does. However, Sign can be used to squeeze the last two life out of a player if it's needed. That usually takes people off guard by my experience, and has won me quite a few games, and it's usually why I choose Sign over Rtb. Definitely go ahead and test both. It's going to come down to what fits your style.

I like this deck though. +1

thatcardguy That's pretty good distinction. And for this deck, I predict Sign in Blood will be more relevant. Thanks for the comment.

What do you think of Necropolis Fiend instead of the angler? It flies an can be used as psuedo-removal. Although it might be too expensive...

I think that Necropolis Fiend could be really good if I weren't running so much delve and graveyard recursion. This deck is already pushing it in terms of using that resource, and I don't think it would be prudent to include even more. I like less conditional removal like Hero's Downfall as it is. Thanks for the suggestion though, I appreciate your feedback.

Why Gurmag Angler, why not Dragonlord Silumgar?

beleren272, mostly because the deck came together during Fate Reforged. Gurmag Angler also has delve, which means that I can get him out significantly earlier. The dragonlord will probably find a home here, but I want to test it out once Dragons drops before I commit him to the list.

Ok. Still love the deck

Thanks man. I'm pretty excited to get it together and take it for a spin.