Not gonna lie, I only clicked on this deck because of the name lol +1 for flavor. Upon actually looking at the deck, I noticed it doeesn't have any of the dual lands right now. Sunpetal Grove, Rootbound Crag , Inspiring Vantage. Is that because of budget reasons? or?

Bellowing Aegisaur > Regisaur Alpha in here (and budget af)LOOKING AT YOU WALKING BALLISTA! (infinite loop for +1/+1 counters)

Because of Reckless Rage, I would +1 Ranging Raptor -4 Drover of the mighty +3 Commune with Dinosaurs (really good at land searching as well as dino search in end game)

I doubt that 13 cards to auto enable enrage, which 7 requires your opponent to have a creature, is enough... Not many can enrage your Siegehorn Ceratops without killing it making it most of the time a slightly better Grizzly Bear. I would play some more copies of Raging Regisaur and/or Raging Swordtooth because hell yeah 5/5 trample for 5 with massive enrage! It all kills the tokens and smaller things efficiently (merfolks if you have that kind of player at your place)

I think it's a personnal choice though. It is a list I'm willing to see in action ... but not against me ! GG

I figure those lands are budget so no comments (Definitly needs check lands, cycle and anti grave thingy... the usual non budget lands)

jdarmstrong135 Actually, I put in the basics cause I wasn't sure about the proper ratio of the check lands and bicycle lands. Plus, basics work better with Raging Raptor.

nephlymio The thing is, Bellowing Aegisaur is expensive at 6 mana for a 3/5, especially if I take Drover. As to your other point, I can definitely see taking out the Regisaur Alpha for either Raging Swordtooth or more Raging Regisaur.

I wouldn't run the bicycle lands. Seems a bit too slow for your deck. Personally, i'd take out one mountain, two forests and one plains, and then put in two of each check land. Just to try it. Then add more or less as needed. I'd leave in the majority of forests that way you have a better chance of each of them coming in untapped.