Was a coincidence: I simply thought that it needed some more win cons and thought it was naive to have 30 creatures as it reduces the creature consistency, so i decided to side them and i thought it also best to have some creature removal on side. I only looked at your deck after as it was on the 'similar to' list and then i laughed and thought "Great minds think alike."
Also considering how many vampire decks there are around, its not that unlikely that two vampire decks would be so similar. As well as the fact that you taught me how to play magic and hence my playing style/card preferences have been influenced by you, therefore greater likelihood of resemblance.
I have beaten both those decks. I beat your RDW about 55%-60% of the time (purely because of Blade) and I am working on making a similar percent chance of win against Jacerator. You changed your RDW and pwned my vamps but then you got rid of it before you could face my updated version. I reckon I could now beat RDW.
i dont understand why u or jake arnt playing nocturnus... it would work soo well in your deck seeing as it only costs 4 and u will hit a black cards ALOT seeing as u only have 16-18 lands
also their is a cool combo with campire aristocrat. u sac bloodghast and then u highborn and deal them 2 life... then get bloodghast back with a land and do them same..
This is almost Identical to mine now. Was that on purpose or just coincidence.
Was a coincidence: I simply thought that it needed some more win cons and thought it was naive to have 30 creatures as it reduces the creature consistency, so i decided to side them and i thought it also best to have some creature removal on side. I only looked at your deck after as it was on the 'similar to' list and then i laughed and thought "Great minds think alike."
Also considering how many vampire decks there are around, its not that unlikely that two vampire decks would be so similar. As well as the fact that you taught me how to play magic and hence my playing style/card preferences have been influenced by you, therefore greater likelihood of resemblance.
No offence... But that deck will lose to everything...
You are trying to play PULSE TRACKER in a constructed deck?!?!
Where is your card advantage? where is the mind sludge???
And feast of blood?... Your actually joking arnt you?.
Hey Feece didn't you get your naya deck handed to you in a doggy bag just the other day by Vamp it up.
True! My constructed in 10 mins never play tested naya deck did get absolutely wiped... But jacerator and red deck won:)
I have beaten both those decks. I beat your RDW about 55%-60% of the time (purely because of Blade) and I am working on making a similar percent chance of win against Jacerator. You changed your RDW and pwned my vamps but then you got rid of it before you could face my updated version. I reckon I could now beat RDW.
why not highborn in main???
That will be rectified.
i dont understand why u or jake arnt playing nocturnus... it would work soo well in your deck seeing as it only costs 4 and u will hit a black cards ALOT seeing as u only have 16-18 lands
Honestly, i just don't like the card; i know its good for the deck but if anything i would only put it in side if i expected the need for it.
lol fair enough
also their is a cool combo with campire aristocrat. u sac bloodghast and then u highborn and deal them 2 life... then get bloodghast back with a land and do them same..
Also dislike vampire aristocrat, although is a good combo i'd rather keep my deck purely chaotic agrro, it's more fun.
Sorry, the spambots have won. Please login above to comment