"Creature-full vamps V2"

Formats: printable | .txt

Standard Mono-Black Aggro Vampire Deck


Score

7

User Lumini_Lumini_Lumo
Tags Aggro, Vampires
Estimated cost $47.54
Format Standard
Sets Worldwake, Zendikar, 2010 Core Set
Cards 64
Date 2010-01-31 17:36:00

Similar to:

Last change: See all

Mana symbols what's this?

cost chart

Land mana what's this?

land chart

Mana curve what's this?

mana curve

Type breakdown

deck type breakdown
TAMA says...
10:27 p.m. on January 31, 2010

This is almost Identical to mine now. Was that on purpose or just coincidence.

12:05 a.m. on February 1, 2010

Was a coincidence: I simply thought that it needed some more win cons and thought it was naive to have 30 creatures as it reduces the creature consistency, so i decided to side them and i thought it also best to have some creature removal on side. I only looked at your deck after as it was on the 'similar to' list and then i laughed and thought "Great minds think alike."

12:17 a.m. on February 1, 2010

Also considering how many vampire decks there are around, its not that unlikely that two vampire decks would be so similar. As well as the fact that you taught me how to play magic and hence my playing style/card preferences have been influenced by you, therefore greater likelihood of resemblance.

Feece says...
4:32 a.m. on February 16, 2010

No offence... But that deck will lose to everything...

You are trying to play PULSE TRACKER in a constructed deck?!?!

Where is your card advantage? where is the mind sludge???

And feast of blood?... Your actually joking arnt you?.

TAMA says...
5:12 a.m. on February 16, 2010

Hey Feece didn't you get your naya deck handed to you in a doggy bag just the other day by Vamp it up.

Feece says...
5:14 a.m. on February 16, 2010

True! My constructed in 10 mins never play tested naya deck did get absolutely wiped... But jacerator and red deck won:)

TAMA says...
5:18 a.m. on February 16, 2010

I have beaten both those decks. I beat your RDW about 55%-60% of the time (purely because of Blade) and I am working on making a similar percent chance of win against Jacerator. You changed your RDW and pwned my vamps but then you got rid of it before you could face my updated version. I reckon I could now beat RDW.

Daniel2395 says...
7 a.m. on February 16, 2010

why not highborn in main???

1:10 a.m. on February 17, 2010

That will be rectified.

Daniel2395 says...
5:12 a.m. on February 21, 2010

i dont understand why u or jake arnt playing nocturnus... it would work soo well in your deck seeing as it only costs 4 and u will hit a black cards ALOT seeing as u only have 16-18 lands

6:07 a.m. on February 21, 2010

Honestly, i just don't like the card; i know its good for the deck but if anything i would only put it in side if i expected the need for it.

Daniel2395 says...
6:08 a.m. on February 21, 2010

lol fair enough

also their is a cool combo with campire aristocrat. u sac bloodghast and then u highborn and deal them 2 life... then get bloodghast back with a land and do them same..

6:11 a.m. on February 21, 2010

Also dislike vampire aristocrat, although is a good combo i'd rather keep my deck purely chaotic agrro, it's more fun.

Sorry, the spambots have won. Please login above to comment