"Creature-full vamps V2" (Standard)

By Lumini_Lumini_Lumo


eldrazi "mtg singles" "mtg cards" "mtg decks" "magic the gathering"

Score: 8

Standard Mono-Black Aggro Vampire Deck


Similar to:

Sparkle Motion
by maddison
Sycophant Vamp
by pggbee

Estimated cost $17.24
Format Standard
Sets Worldwake, Zendikar, 2010 Core Set
Cards 64
Date 2010-01-31 17:36:00

Export:

Categorize by:

Sideboard and Maybeboard below the ad


Sideboard (12)

Mana symbols chart help docs

cost chart

Land mana

land chart

Mana curve

mana curve

Type breakdown

deck type breakdown
#1 | TAMA says...
10:27 p.m. on January 31, 2010

This is almost Identical to mine now. Was that on purpose or just coincidence.

12:05 a.m. on February 1, 2010

Was a coincidence: I simply thought that it needed some more win cons and thought it was naive to have 30 creatures as it reduces the creature consistency, so i decided to side them and i thought it also best to have some creature removal on side. I only looked at your deck after as it was on the 'similar to' list and then i laughed and thought "Great minds think alike."

12:17 a.m. on February 1, 2010

Also considering how many vampire decks there are around, its not that unlikely that two vampire decks would be so similar. As well as the fact that you taught me how to play magic and hence my playing style/card preferences have been influenced by you, therefore greater likelihood of resemblance.

#4 | Feece says...
4:32 a.m. on February 16, 2010

No offence... But that deck will lose to everything...

You are trying to play PULSE TRACKER in a constructed deck?!?!

Where is your card advantage? where is the mind sludge???

And feast of blood?... Your actually joking arnt you?.

#5 | TAMA says...
5:12 a.m. on February 16, 2010

Hey Feece didn't you get your naya deck handed to you in a doggy bag just the other day by Vamp it up.

#6 | Feece says...
5:14 a.m. on February 16, 2010

True! My constructed in 10 mins never play tested naya deck did get absolutely wiped... But jacerator and red deck won:)

#7 | TAMA says...
5:18 a.m. on February 16, 2010

I have beaten both those decks. I beat your RDW about 55%-60% of the time (purely because of Blade) and I am working on making a similar percent chance of win against Jacerator. You changed your RDW and pwned my vamps but then you got rid of it before you could face my updated version. I reckon I could now beat RDW.

#8 | Daniel2395 says...
7 a.m. on February 16, 2010

why not highborn in main???

1:10 a.m. on February 17, 2010

That will be rectified.

#10 | Daniel2395 says...
5:12 a.m. on February 21, 2010

i dont understand why u or jake arnt playing nocturnus... it would work soo well in your deck seeing as it only costs 4 and u will hit a black cards ALOT seeing as u only have 16-18 lands

6:07 a.m. on February 21, 2010

Honestly, i just don't like the card; i know its good for the deck but if anything i would only put it in side if i expected the need for it.

#12 | Daniel2395 says...
6:08 a.m. on February 21, 2010

lol fair enough

also their is a cool combo with campire aristocrat. u sac bloodghast and then u highborn and deal them 2 life... then get bloodghast back with a land and do them same..

6:11 a.m. on February 21, 2010

Also dislike vampire aristocrat, although is a good combo i'd rather keep my deck purely chaotic agrro, it's more fun.

Who are we?

This site © 2008-2010 Oberfraktur, LLC

Terms of Use

Privacy statement

DMCA requests

Who aren't we?

Magic the Gathering is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved.

This site is unaffiliated. Articles and comments are user-submitted and do not represent official endorsements of this site.

Need hosting?

Use Linode!

And while you're at it, give me referral bucks by clicking my handy link. Pays for server!

An ongoing Django Adventure