mtg, mtg cards, magic the gathering, gaming, geeks
i agree that Contagion Engine would be a better choice over Decimator Web in terms of proliferating. the reason why i chose to go with Decimator Web was that it can also get me a poison counter on my opponent to begin with. do you think that -1 Decimator Web , +1 Contagion Engine would serve me better?
oh, and Go for the Throat , i obviously did not intend that. tappedout went haywire for some reason when i was tweaking my sideboard. lol.
wat no Thrummingbird ? best proliferate card in my opinion. a set of Thrummingbird with a set of Everflowing Chalice = heavy mana acceleration for your contagion artifacts. add a set of Grand Architect and things get really fast, but i can see you're trying to keep it more of a control build. I am just addicted to fast decks i guess!
@Kalani: i agree with all your suggestions, however the reason why im not running them is, like you mentioned, i prefer to run the control build. now looking at it from that perspective, whats your thought on it? anything i can add/remove to make the deck more efficient?
Thanks for the suggestion!
nice deck, simple, i would definately throw in a few Distortion Strike they are soo useful with infect deck, especially the rebound.
| Date added | 2 years |
| Last updated | 2 years |
| Legal formats | None |
| Sets | 2012 Core Set , Mirrodin Besieged, Scars of Mirrodin, 2011 Core Set |
| Cards | 60 |
| Avg. CMC | 2.57 |
Embed code |
|
B/U Proliferate
Zungx says...
I do not really think Decimator Web is that useful here, sure it can get the opponent a poison counter, but for only 2 mana more over 2 turns, you can use Contagion Engine to get 2 poison counters down as well as twiddle away the opponents creatures.
Oh, and I truly doubt 7x Go for the Throat s would be useful in the sideboard at all seeing as you will only be able to add 4 into the deck...
January 31, 2011 9:50 p.m.