Sideboard


I was Pondering something for a while: Mardu Warrior Aggro. After giving it a lot of thought, I concluded that breaking it down to just White/Black made it faster and more reliable.

The Pros of Keeping This Deck W/B:

  • I need to play only one scry-temple for this deck's land base, thus decreasing the number of tapped lands I play and speeding up the overall tempo.

  • If I go Mardu, I will play way too many three converted mana cost spells, and won't have too many one or two drops. It also allows me to play Sign in Blood , which would be too color intensive for the Mardu deck.

  • Aggro decks in the metagame nowadays tend to prey upon decks that play tapped lands.

The Khans of Keeping This Deck W/B:

Now that I have gone over the reasons to play this deck, I will elaborate on the purposes of each of the cards:

So, knowing the cards in the mainboard is half of the strategy. The other half is knowing how to sideboard:

Jeskai Tempo:-4 Herald of Anafenza+2 Pharika's Cure , +2 Bile Blight

Abzan Midrange-2 Raiders' Spoils, -4 Tormented Hero , -1 Plains, -1 Bloodsoaked Champion+1 Hero's Downfall, +3 Mardu Skullhunter, +2 Suspension Field +2 Despise

UB Control-3 Hero's Downfall, -1 Sightless Brawler +3 Mardu Skullhunter, +1 Raiders' Spoils

WR Heroic-4 Tormented Hero , -2 Raiders' Spoils+2 Bile Blight, +2 Despise , +2 Erase

Thank you for viewing this deck. I ask for any feedback you have.

Suggestions

Updates Add

Comments

Attention! Complete Comment Tutorial! This annoying message will go away once you do!

Hi! Please consider becoming a supporter of TappedOut for $3/mo. Thanks!


Important! Formatting tipsComment Tutorialmarkdown syntax

Please login to comment

Date added 9 years
Last updated 9 years
Legality

This deck is not Standard legal.

Rarity (main - side)

2 - 0 Mythic Rares

23 - 0 Rares

22 - 8 Uncommons

3 - 7 Commons

Cards 60
Avg. CMC 2.29
Tokens Emblem Sorin, Solemn Visitor, Vampire 2/2 B, Warrior 1/1 W
Votes
Ignored suggestions
Shared with
Views