Molten Rain

Legality

Format Legality
Tiny Leaders Legal
Noble Legal
Leviathan Legal
Custom Legal
Magic Duels Legal
Canadian Highlander Legal
Vintage Legal
Modern Legal
Casual Legal
Pauper EDH Legal
Vanguard Legal
Legacy Legal
Archenemy Legal
Planechase Legal
1v1 Commander Legal
Duel Commander Legal
Oathbreaker Legal
Unformat Legal
Pauper Legal
Commander / EDH Legal

Printings View all

Set Rarity
Modern Masters 2017 Edition (MM3) Uncommon
Mirrodin (MRD) Common

Combos Browse all

Molten Rain

Sorcery

Destroy target land. If that land was nonbasic, Molten Rain deals 2 damage to the land's controller.

Molten Rain Discussion

PhoenixNest on Burn Motherf*cker, Burn!

3 weeks ago

1- Melek is too expensive at 6 mana, and would be incredibly hard to cast with just 22 lands, so you should cut him. Same thing with Niv Mizzet. Jaya and the Mirrari conjecture aren't very good cards and will slow your deck down because they're five mana, and burn decks want to win as quick as possible. Frostburn Weird is not powerful either since it requires an investment to keep pumping it and keeps you from casting more spells.

2- The deck isn't fast enough, IMO. The reason decks like this aren't very powerful is because control decks want to slow down the game and get rid of your opponent's threats. Burn decks want to win as fast as possible without worrying too much about your opponent's gameplan. To look for better options in your burn deck, I'd suggest using this link to see the top builds for Burn: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/archetype/modern-burn-46478#paper.

3- The link above will help you find more high-value cards.

4- If you're going for a straight-burn decks, 22 lands is too much, and 20 would be more suitable. Seeing as your deck is more of a control-aggro deck, 22 lands should be find, but you should trim the 5cc spells.

5- Here's what I would do for the sideboard: 2x Abrade 2x Dragon's Claw 2x Molten Rain 3x Leyline of the Void 2x Ceremonious Rejection 2x Ratchet Bomb 2x Skullcrack

clayperce on

4 weeks ago

Sarkhan420X,
Look, I know you think Rootbound Crag is fine in the deck, but I was serious earlier when I said you'd be better off with Basics, so I'm going to invest some time and try this again.

Here's the math:

  • In its current config (3x untapped Green-only sources, 1x untapped Red-only sources, 12x untapped Dual sources, 14x 3-drops, and 8x 4-drops), the deck has a 43% chance of generating 1RR on Turn 2 (important for Pillage or Molten Rain ) and an overall 42% chance of being able to cast a 3-drop on Turn 2 and a 4% chance of a 4-drop on Turn 2. Now, this is from a goldfish simulation, so obviously things like mulligans and opponent interaction can change the real-world results. But the numbers are still useful for comparing different manabases.
  • Replacing the 4x Rootbound Crag with 4x Basic Forest gives the deck 7x untapped Green-only sources and makes it much easier to cast a Bird/Elf/Sprawl on Turn 1. This raises the chance of having 1RR on Turn 2 to 54%, and yields an overall 50% chance of being able to cast a 3-drop on Turn 2, and a 6% chance of a 4-drop.

Here's a write-up on the simulation, if you'd like to check out the numbers yourself.

Cheers.

sprtsfan11 on land destruction in progress

1 month ago

I really like this deck concept, I am "that guy" who loves playing land destruction, so I'll probably try this against my friends!

I just have a couple suggestions:

  1. To make it modern legal and follow more of what it seems you're trying to do, try putting in Leyline of Sanctity . That card prevents you from being the target of spells, which can be really helpful with decks like this. Replace the Leyline of Combustion with this, and you're set.

  2. I would love to hear your reasoning for the Guttersnipe in the deck. If it's just a favorite card, I'm not against it, but with only 9 instants/sorceries in the deck, I don't think it's really necessary.

  3. If you're looking for some good land destruction spells, try either Molten Rain or Stone Rain , because those are really strong for not too much cost.

Overall, I love the deck and look forward to trying it out!

Icbrgr on Is this combo good enough ...

2 months ago

Granted I never played competitively but; I think that looks like a really "nice" combo that can fit into a skred red shell.

3x Blood Moon 4x Koth of the Hammer 4x Skred

4x Shenanigans 4x Liquimetal Coating 2x Molten Rain 4x Abrade

With Snow-Covered Mountain and Scrying Sheets Leaving enough room to put in however much more sweepers like Anger of the Gods / Pyroclasm and burn you see fit?

BoneclockHarmony on Mono Red Taxes (aka Bomat Red)

2 months ago

So I've played a bit more, so far

3-0 Izzet Phoenix

3-1 4c Saheeli

1-2 Pyro Prison

1-1 Mardu Pyro

My current creature package is:

4x Monastery Swiftspear

4x Bomat Courier

3x Soul-Scar Mage

2x Ash Zealot

2x Harsh Mentor

4x Eidolon of the Great Revel

3x Rampaging Ferocidon

2x Goblin Chainwhirler

With the rest of the list mostly same as yours (although, I accidentally played a few games with my sideboard searing blood's in my mainboard, and kind of liked it a lot?)

Some thoughts (still very new to modern so there's a lot of interactions I might just be completely un-aware of):

I see why we'd have Relic over Ravenous Trap now, didn't really want to bring in ravenous trap vs mardu pyro but Relic would be sweat, so I'll probably make that change too. Also saves me the hazzle of finding non-proxy ravenous traps, which are completely impossible to buy where I live.

I was thinking if we could replace ratchet bomb with mainboard Blast Zone , until I realized that it 1) Gets blanked by Blood Moon 2) Starts with a counter on it so we can't even hit chalice 3) Probably screws up our RR on turn two too badly.

Oh well, it sounded good in my head before I remembered about those minor details.

What do you think about Pillage vs Molten Rain for the sideboard? Doubling as artifact removal is nice, one of the main decks we'd bring land destruction in against is Tron right? Which makes it pull double duty.

The new canopy cycle of lands, I almost want to go UP in lands a little bit if we include them? Flooding is less bad since we can sac it to draw, more lands -> more reliable mana for our 3 drops. Not sure if it opens up any interesting sideboard options at all on its own, but with some RW fetches maybe?

Speaking of 3 drops, tried Scab-Clan Berserker at all?

Liquidbeaver on Liquidbeaver's Liquimetal Landscaping Service

2 months ago

Still going back and forth on a few slots:

Stone Rain / Molten Rain / Shenanigans / Structural Distortion as a 1-of. Really don't know which direction to go with this. Something I can cascade into (which can only target one permanent type), or something cascade misses that can hit a lot more things, with a little burn attached to it?

Also the Talisman of Impulse . Really not sure about this slot, but after looking at a lot of ponza lists it seems like this slot needs to be ramp of some sort (Birds maybe).

It's going to take a lot of playtesting to figure out these narrow questions probably.

Liquidbeaver on Liquidbeaver's Liquimetal Landscaping Service

2 months ago

Trying to decide on what should sit in the Stone Rain slot. Possibly Molten Rain for a little bit more damage, especially if I manage to ultimate Wrenn and Six . Shenanigans also looks interesting, but is maybe more of a sideboard cards against very heavy artifact decks, as I already have 9 artifact removal spells. I would prefer something that I could cascade into.

Let me know if you have any ideas!

Liquidbeaver on Ponzi Scheme [Eldrazi Ponza]

4 months ago

TheLoneDart: I definitely wanted the deck to have more traditional LD like that, but as it came together I ran out of space to run very many, so I settled for the Crumble to Dust s. This is just my first pass at the deck, so as I refine hopefully I can fit at least some Stone Rain s in. Molten Rain having double red might be too hard to cast.

Load more

Molten Rain occurrence in decks from the last year

Modern:

All decks: 0.03%

Commander / EDH:

All decks: 0.0%