Gate Colossus

Combos Browse all Suggest

Legality

Format Legality
1v1 Commander Legal
Alchemy Legal
Archenemy Legal
Arena Legal
Block Constructed Legal
Canadian Highlander Legal
Casual Legal
Commander / EDH Legal
Commander: Rule 0 Legal
Custom Legal
Duel Commander Legal
Gladiator Legal
Highlander Legal
Historic Legal
Legacy Legal
Leviathan Legal
Limited Legal
Modern Legal
Oathbreaker Legal
Pioneer Legal
Planechase Legal
Quest Magic Legal
Vanguard Legal
Vintage Legal

Gate Colossus

Artifact Creature — Construct

This spell costs less to cast for each Gate you control.

Gate Colossus can't be blocked by creatures with power 2 or less.

Whenever a Gate enters the battlefield under your control, you may put Gate Colossus from your graveyard on top of your library.

Wufankitt on Ridiculously dumb gates idea

8 months ago

might i suggest Gate Colossus

Akromathia on an izzet deck V1

5 years ago

Hello! Be most welcome to MTG! I wish you the best duels and adventures with this great community!

Now, to the deck!

It looks good, but there is something that I think you should keep on mind. Usually this kind of decks runs out of gas very very quickly. The way to solve that out is by “card draw” spells, of those you have none. I suggest any combination of:

RED: BLUE: Also, some of the creatures need rework in my opinion.

Hope this helps!

Have a wonderful day! <3

frosthammer_eden on Karn's Surveillance

5 years ago

Don't be afraid to put more than one copy of a good card(Namely Karn, Scion of Urza who is you win condition). Mind Rot Should definitely be taken out as it isn't a very good card in the first place and does nothing for your deck. Drill Bit could be replaced with Duress . Also I'd definitely switch Thought Collapse for more Sinister Sabotage as it fits your deck way more. Gate Colossus will also 9 out of 10 times be a 6 or 7 mana 8/8 so not great value, maybe add another surveiler instead.

Stazeeee on Four Color Guildgates

5 years ago

The shell of your deck looks pretty solid. Just some thoughts but what do you think about the following:

Load more