Fade Away


Format Legality
Pre-release Legal
Noble Legal
Leviathan Legal
Tiny Leaders Legal
Magic Duels Legal
Vintage Legal
Casual Legal
Vanguard Legal
Legacy Legal
Archenemy Legal
Planechase Legal
1v1 Commander Legal
Duel Commander Legal
Unformat Legal
Pauper Legal
Commander / EDH Legal

Printings View all

Set Rarity
Exodus (EXO) Common

Combos Browse all

Fade Away


For each creature, that creature's controller pays (1) or sacrifices a permanent.

Price & Acquistion Set Price Alerts



Have (1) frederiklw
Want (0)

Recent Decks

Load more

Fade Away Discussion

Von.Banamaor on A Tax to Grind (Azorius W/U Control)

3 months ago

Hey Podkomorka, I appreciate the feedback, but just to be clear my goal was never to build a control deck. Goals like that tend to converge on mainstream decks which I try desperately to avoid. My goal here was to build the best deck I could based on Fade Away. And I have to disagree with you about Fade Away. Most pauper decks play low on land and heavy on creatures. Which make them particularly vulnerable to Fade Away. In most exchanges it's a 3-1 card advantage and sometimes (with elves, goblins, stompy, etc) much, much bigger. Alternatively, those that play low on creatures tend to be particularly vulnerable to COPs. So this deck tends to have an answer for everything. In general it only struggles because it has one or two answers and not four or eight answers. So a couple key counterspells or removal spells can cause real problems. But overall it's a good deck nobody sees coming. Having Runes of Protection and other more typically sideboard bound cards in the main deck really wreck havoc in the first game. And frankly, how do you define control? I define control as a defensively oriented deck designed to limit your opponents options and disrupt their ability to pursue their preferred method of attack in a systematic way. This deck checks all of those marks for me.

Podkomorka on A Tax to Grind (Azorius W/U Control)

3 months ago

I'm going to be a little blunt. I think it's cool to really like something and try to make it work. After testing the deck and looking over it I can tell you that your deck is not much of a control deck. You said it yourself, you try not to die and thats it. As it is I would say your deck is just trying to cast Fade Away (which to be honest is pretty bad effect especially if youre trying to play control) just to see what happens. If you're interested in building a true blue whote control deck i would be happy to help you. I would give lots of good card suggestions. As it is now, however, the control viability is almost non existent.

Gattison on Song of Faeries

4 months ago

Fade Away for weenies matchups?

Wyyern on Welcome to the Undercity

6 months ago

Nice deck , really appriciate the diplomacy factor.Suggestions are:Trepanation Blade fun little mill and power boostNecrotic Ooze why not enjoy all those cards in the graveyardsFade Away when correctly played, this is an awesome whipeHavengul Lich Geth's assistantDiabolic Vision fav of mine in dimir

ibstudent2200 on Nicol Bolas Archenemy Coop/Solo EDH Variant

7 months ago

As far as decks used, one of them was Azusa, Lost. The other was a fairly casual Rhys the Redeemed list that probably doesn't even break the 50% mark as far as optimization level.

It isn't difficult to handle Every Last Vestige Shall Rot if you're just defining behavior. You need a rule that states "Nicol Bolas always pays full costs for effects" and errata Every Last Vestige Shall Rot to have a limit of INT_MAX for X (or declare a finite, but very large amount of mana for Bolas to be able to spend each turn). This rule also prevents cards like Fade Away and Flow of Maggots from causing problems for the Bolas AI. If you add this rule, you'll probably want to ban Killing Wave, but that card should generally be banned from any format where at least one player is autonomous.

As an aside, it's possible under the current ruleset for the first player to get targeted by Behold the Power of Destruction and then hit by Nicol Bolas, which could knock a player mostly out of the game. Is this something worth changing the rules to avoid?

The7thBobba on Thraximundar

8 months ago

I really dig the look of this!

It's got all the cool dudes :)

Except for a few: Prince of Thralls comboes very well with you commander, and so does Fade Away and Slave of Bolas.

Maybe a bit more removal, like Dreadbore or Terminate?

Apart from that. This looks absolutely solid!

Cartrix on Pirates Don't Have Friends

10 months ago

I have a similar deck called Bloody PIRATES! where I use Ghostway, Fade Away, and Archaeomancer. +1 from me :D

Von.Banamaor on UB Mana tax

10 months ago

I am building my own pauper taxing deck based on an old, old deck I once played with using Errant Minion and Winter Orb. I thought I'd see what I could do with a pauper variant. Here is a link to my deck: A Tax to Grind

To start off, I really like what you have going here.

A few suggestions...

Right off, I think you should consider Errant Minion for reasons I don't think I need to explain. Perhaps in place of Soul Barrier?

Most cards in pauper are very cheap and lots of decks are very thin on mana production as a result, so playing Rhystic Study can be a huge burden. Playing more than one, is almost unfair. Plus, you should really have some card drawing ability.

Here are some other ways to consider tapping creatures: Flood, Rhystic Deluge, Norritt & Rathi Trapper.

Shimmering Glasskite might be an interesting creature to consider as well. It'll be hard for your opponent to cast two creature-hate spells in a turn.

You might want to consider Fade Away for the sideboard if too many creatures are hitting the table.

And one last note, if you were to splash green, Kruphix's Insight and Aura Gnarlid would be brutal.

Load more