mtg, mtg cards, magic the gathering, gaming, geeks
1) All questions are two parts. Each question is worth a total of 10 points. The entire exam is worth 100 points.
2) You have one week to complete the exam. Entries will not be accepted after INSERTDATE at 11:59pm EDT.
3) All answers will be emailed to myself at email@example.com. DO NOT POST ANSWERS ON THIS PAGE!
4) For the subject of the email, title it "Tapped Out Exam 1 - (insert user name)".
5) No help. Do the work yourself and do not ask anyone else. I'm testing YOUR knowledge.
6) The better the explanation, the more points you'll earn. Be precise and be thorough.
7) Good luck!
1a) Is this legal?
1b) Why or why not?
2a) Is this legal?
2b) Why or why not?
On the battlefield under Legendinc's control is a Goblin Arsonist
with a Basilisk Collar
attached. Siegfried casts Burst Lightning
, targeting the Goblin Arsonist
. After it resolves, Goblin Arsonist
is put into the graveyard. As his ability triggers, Legendinc targets Siegfried's Inferno Titan
, destroying it. Legendinc gains 1 life.
3a) Is this legal?
3b) Why or why not?
yeaGO! is attacking with a Blightsteel Colossus
. BrownDog5117 declares two Squadron Hawk
s as blockers. yeaGO! assigns all 11 combat damage to one Squadron Hawk
. The remaining 10 damage hits BrownDog5117 due to trample, resulting in 10 poison counters.
4a) Is this legal?
4b) Why or why not?
5a) Is this legal?
5b) Why or why not?
insertcleverid, jessetaverne, and WiseHeart65 are in a free-for-all match. insertcleverid is at 3 life and jessetaverne is at 2 life. insertcleverid casts Forked Bolt
, targeting jessetaverne. In response, WiseHeart65 casts Lightning Bolt
, targeting insertcleverid. The Lightning Bolt
resolves, killing insertcleverid. Then, the Forked Bolt
resolves, killing jessetaverne. Thus, WiseHeart65 wins the match.
6a) Is this legal?
6b) Why or why not?
mafteechr and theemptyquiver are playing a Two-Headed Giant game against π_is_the_word and onthewater. During the former's turn, theemptyquiver attacks with Neurok Commando
. No blockers are declared, and the team of π_is_the_word and onthewater take 2 damage, and theemptyquiver draws 2 cards.
7a) Is this legal?
7b) Why or why not?
8a) How much damage does Gamer7129 take?
DingoDan controls a Jace Beleren
with 2 loyalty counters. memaw381 casts an Inferno Titan
, which resolves. As Inferno Titan
's enter the battlefield ability triggers, memaw381 targets Jace Beleren
for 2 damage, and DingoDan for 1 damage.
9a) Is this legal?
9b) Why or why not?
and muffludwig both control a Mimic Vat
. During his turn, Kalani
, targeting muffludwig's Kuldotha Forgemaster
. It resolves, and Kuldotha Forgemaster
is put into muffludwig's graveyard.
personally i would think that using the rules is cheating, since you can figure everything out just by reading the rules a lot...but that's just me. i did mine straight from memory, without looking at anything other than facebook (which doesn't have anything
re: post #10: to be precise, the March 25th, 2011 rules update will contain a new rule 600.1.9, stating that any play KrazyCaley makes is legal as long as it involves at least 1 blue card. Since Thrummingbird is blue, this play is legit.
Bonus credit: If painter's servant were on the board with any other color named, it would invoke rule 747.b.o.e.i.n.g, stating that whenever a card that would be blue is made un-blue, each player may punch KrazyCaley once, while shouting 'HOW YOU LIKE ME NOW?'
in other news, there's been an unusual spike in landot's sugar consumption today. reports at 11.
You will also get -10 points for casting card:Orim's Chant without the kicker added because you got beat down by the other player's creatures.
The prize for this is the overwhelming satisfaction that you are very knowledgeable about all things Magic: the Gathering.
Someone voiced a similar opinion earlier, and mafteechr simply said that "Rules and Oracle quotes are not necessary" - but not that they're against the rules. At any rate, I hope they're not disallowed because I used them to double-check my work and cite references once I was done.
Besides, pi could just be meaning that he's going to brush up on rules, then sit down and do the test, just like you study for a normal exam in class.
I just tried to treat it like I was writing to or talking to someone who's new to Magic and was asking for an explanation. Meaning, I explained it in "layman's terms" as best I could, and then I wrote down Comp Rules citations for some of the more complicated ones so that someone who's interested could look them up themselves and find out more. I also used the Comp Rules to double-check that I was slinging the correct terminology around for a couple of them.
well i figured he was gunna grade em as he got em. make a word document with the answers ready to be cut/paste in the comment box or emails however he was gunna give em and write down who got wat on a little notepad next to the computer. thats wat i would do.
Keep in mind he's got to do some subjective grading here, though. Yeah, he can quickly mark off what's wrong and what's right, but the next step is looking at each person's "why or why not" portion and determining how well they explained things.
If he's going to do any sort of tier system, then he's got to spend time figuring out who answered it best. (Not sure if he's doing that though, just noting that that'd add extra time.)
And of course, there's the little matter of a real life. Work could be keeping him busy.
Work is keeping me busy. Sorry I haven't finished. I'm about half done.
MagnorCriol is absolutely correct. There is a lot of subjective grading going on. I have to interpret a lot of explanations to see if you really understand what rules are taking place.